From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BE8C6786C for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE102086A for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 04:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="VxD7h1hu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3BE102086A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727421AbeJLLcG (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 07:32:06 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f50.google.com ([209.85.161.50]:33938 "EHLO mail-yw1-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727122AbeJLLcF (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 07:32:05 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f50.google.com with SMTP id m129-v6so4477025ywc.1 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:01:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bML/mDmDI//IU4h/fTLC2TM4+sEZurQ5hghChA7ypBQ=; b=VxD7h1hutE92QjAH2aWkHhHKRaA6eZVFazfG0EWG+xN01xSFhQoucM4Ae5x0wJ9PI0 4T/EcTOtYjPBIx941gFwnYXMiUeSFPD0I1s8Qg5Hg3bO0ZdVOMML6bTpVL/BCXA3Pbw/ ylby9rZCjF9ohjg1Ci5CV51obg0KyuHGx/6co= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bML/mDmDI//IU4h/fTLC2TM4+sEZurQ5hghChA7ypBQ=; b=Zt9kUxlkyULEnDwMuBLO1c3gR4hF+1+hgdLNpdmKq+LJHnUbcugvZvCz0lDDbRcxz/ VWsDX495wTChXuaLllHP4cpssxPKmaiu2I5k5RZ4YgVKZvHpMYWLWVBrUkS1tw69WK9j iAorB28Va7pwssLneCWOE0UnEx79VwuD6vYdMq3/3XWBbQEKM2KBpgSf+j60wEln8rpk QeDY/3BxNphhZR0l5aHyubL17NWnmgpM9am7zmgEUUfpmZc+IxmisUVk0ZjWsze2F7CK +Hbw5tMf05e88C1SHWeFIAN3G2WLEy7BZdLZpWYmD4b3Su/z7XCTWrcvIoqpB8c78kIA NksA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoj144acF9LfL8U0CYFVctmWTut6IeM0mFcyZTKZDDgQyfygalX7 pc/kc381NvKnCLy5U9SrDuPMpcfLn3NV/s4wnpP+yg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV6266DKMgue+pxntfSJ79e2cFPFhfptq7hwRe0KMkyPJOhm367mfz9zr7PbDfqeXrQSxh8qrUM9dgK3Fz+L4pyo= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:d801:: with SMTP id a1-v6mr2429648ywe.399.1539316900991; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:01:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1539231895-4118-1-git-send-email-firoz.khan@linaro.org> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D40F9DD@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D40F9DD@ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com> From: Firoz Khan Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:31:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] ia64: system call table generation support To: Tony Luck Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Philippe Ombredanne , Kate Stewart , y2038 Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Arch , Arnd Bergmann , Deepa Dinamani , Marcin Juszkiewicz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 22:59, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Third time lucky. This series boots without any obvious errors on my ia64 machine. Great! Thanks for your support! > > That's not and Ack or Review ... I just applied, compiled and booted. I suspect the offset logic in the system call generation script had a bug. That I fixed it in this patch series. Arnd and Eugene had shared few comments on adding new system call entry in the table and some other things. Appreciate if you can review this patch series so I can finalize system call table implementation for ia64 architecture. Firoz > > -Tony