From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf parse-event: Fix memory leak in evsel->unit
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:12:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgtDq8yOFDEGEdTD9kN=Ko1gX=5o+tAB4+EDtN0WtGQPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0679eacce01f187037e726a45e6acdacde61f99d.camel@redhat.com>
Hello Ian and David,
Thank you for the good suggestions!
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 4:56 AM David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
> Some ideas (with the caveat that I'm a GCC developer, and not a regular
> on LKML): can you capture the ownership status in the type system?
> I'm brainstorming here but how about:
> typedef char *owned_string_t;
> typedef const char *borrowed_string_t;
> This would at least capture the intent in human-readable form, and
> *might* make things more amenable to checking by a machine. It's also
> less macro cruft.
> I take it that capturing the ownership status with a runtime flag next
> to the pointer in a struct is too expensive for your code?
Adding more random thoughts..
I think we can make it more generic like __attribute__((owned))
so that it can be applied to any pointers. And we can use a
conventional macro like '__owned' in the declaration..
__owned char *name;
__owned char *strdup(const char *);
...
Thanks
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 3:18 [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 01/11] perf metric: Fix some " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 02/11] perf metric: Fix some memory leaks - part 2 Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 11:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 03/11] perf evlist: Fix cpu/thread map leak Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 04/11] perf parse-event: Fix cpu map leaks Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 14:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 16:51 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 05/11] perf parse-event: Fix memory leak in evsel->unit Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 18:59 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 19:56 ` David Malcolm
2020-09-16 7:12 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-09-16 18:37 ` Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 20:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 06/11] perf test: Fix memory leaks in parse-metric test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:23 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 07/11] perf metric: Release expr_parse_ctx after testing Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 08/11] perf metric: Free metric when it failed to resolve Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 12:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 09/11] perf metric: Do not free metric when " Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 10/11] perf test: Free aliases for PMU event map aliases test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 7:37 ` John Garry
2020-09-15 11:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH 11/11] perf test: Free formats for perf pmu parse test Namhyung Kim
2020-09-15 5:15 ` [PATCHSET v2 00/11] perf tools: Fix various memory leaks Ian Rogers
2020-09-15 14:49 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9d7cgtDq8yOFDEGEdTD9kN=Ko1gX=5o+tAB4+EDtN0WtGQPw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).