From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] perf/core: Fix incosistency between cgroup sched_out and sched_in
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:06:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chL6r=4Ay6udSv-heyH3pAdH=Cp+2mXU2-+Z7yHt+aH7w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c9f2383-ec9f-f819-d7be-23aed2bf121a@bytedance.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 8:28 AM Chengming Zhou
<zhouchengming@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> On 2022/3/22 11:16 下午, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> > Hi peter,
> >
> > On 2022/3/22 10:54 下午, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:38:21PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> >>> On 2022/3/22 8:59 下午, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 08:08:29PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> >>>>> There is a race problem that can trigger WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuctx->cgrp)
> >>>>> in perf_cgroup_switch().
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CPU1 CPU2
> >>>>> (in context_switch) (attach running task)
> >>>>> perf_cgroup_sched_out(prev, next)
> >>>>> cgrp1 == cgrp2 is True
> >>>>> next->cgroups = cgrp3
> >>>>> perf_cgroup_attach()
> >>>>> perf_cgroup_sched_in(prev, next)
> >>>>> cgrp1 == cgrp3 is False
>
> I see, you must have been misled by my wrong drawing above ;-)
> I'm sorry, perf_cgroup_attach() on the right should be put at the bottom.
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> (in context_switch) (attach running task)
> perf_cgroup_sched_out(prev, next)
> cgrp1 == cgrp2 is True
> next->cgroups = cgrp3
> perf_cgroup_sched_in(prev, next)
> cgrp1 == cgrp3 is False
> __perf_cgroup_move()
>
Yep, this is a real race and I saw the warnings reported sometimes.
The perf_cgroup_attach() is called after the task's cgroup is changed.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-22 12:08 [PATCH v2 0/6] perf/core: Fixes and cleanup for cgroup events Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] perf/core: Fix incosistency between cgroup sched_out and sched_in Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 13:38 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 15:16 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 15:28 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 22:06 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2022-03-23 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] perf/core: Introduce percpu perf_cgroup Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 16:33 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-23 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-23 12:58 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 22:21 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-03-22 22:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-03-23 1:27 ` [Phishing Risk] [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-23 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-23 13:07 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-23 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-23 13:37 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-23 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-23 15:44 ` Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] perf/core: Don't pass task around when ctx sched in Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] perf/core: Use stable cpuctx->cgrp when update perf cgroup time Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] perf/core: Always set cpuctx cgrp when enable cgroup event Chengming Zhou
2022-03-22 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] perf/core: Don't need event_filter_match when merge_sched_in() Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM9d7chL6r=4Ay6udSv-heyH3pAdH=Cp+2mXU2-+Z7yHt+aH7w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).