From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] perf tools: Improve topology test
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:21:40 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cj6zbsVB_DNmH0R9XqVJfXe9bofMwreH+u-BaDL-xm2_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117144845.13714-2-james.clark@arm.com>
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:49 PM James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Improve the topology test to check all aggregation
> types. This is to lock down the behaviour before
> 'id' is changed into a struct in later commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/topology.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> index 22daf2bdf5fa..7bd8848d36b6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> @@ -64,10 +64,11 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
> .path = path,
> .mode = PERF_DATA_MODE_READ,
> };
> - int i;
> + int i, id;
>
> session = perf_session__new(&data, false, NULL);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get session", !IS_ERR(session));
> + cpu__setup_cpunode_map();
>
> /* On platforms with large numbers of CPUs process_cpu_topology()
> * might issue an error while reading the perf.data file section
> @@ -85,11 +86,18 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
> * "socket_id number is too big. You may need to upgrade the
> * perf tool."
> *
> - * This is the reason why this test might be skipped.
> + * This is the reason why this test might be skipped. aarch64 and
> + * s390 always write this part of the header, even when the above
> + * condition is true (see do_core_id_test in header.c). So always
> + * run this test on those platforms.
> */
> - if (!session->header.env.cpu)
> + if (!session->header.env.cpu
> + && strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "s390", 4)
> + && strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "aarch64", 7))
> return TEST_SKIP;
>
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Session header CPU map not set", session->header.env.cpu);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < session->header.env.nr_cpus_avail; i++) {
> if (!cpu_map__has(map, i))
> continue;
> @@ -98,14 +106,45 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
> session->header.env.cpu[i].socket_id);
> }
>
> + // Test that core ID contains socket, die and core
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + id = cpu_map__get_core(map, i, NULL);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Core ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].core_id == cpu_map__id_to_cpu(id));
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> + cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Die ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == cpu_map__id_to_die(id));
> + }
> +
> + // Test that die ID contains socket and die
> for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core ID doesn't match",
> - (session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].core_id == (cpu_map__get_core(map, i, NULL) & 0xffff)));
> + id = cpu_map__get_die(map, i, NULL);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> + cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));
I'm not sure it works. It seems cpu_map__get_die() returns
16 bit id (socket | die) but cpu_map__id_to_socket() takes
32 bit id (socket | die | core), right?
>
> - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket ID doesn't match",
> - (session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id == cpu_map__get_socket(map, i, NULL)));
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Die ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == cpu_map__id_to_die(id));
> }
>
> + // Test that socket ID contains only socket
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + id = cpu_map__get_socket(map, i, NULL);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> + session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> + cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));
Same here.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + }
> +
> + // Test that node ID contains only node
> + for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> + id = cpu_map__get_node(map, i, NULL);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - Node ID doesn't match",
> + cpu__get_node(map->map[i]) == id);
> + }
> perf_session__delete(session);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.28.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-18 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 14:48 [PATCH v5 00/12] perf tools: fix perf stat with large socket IDs James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] perf tools: Improve topology test James Clark
2020-11-18 11:21 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-11-26 13:46 ` James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] perf tools: Use allocator for perf_cpu_map James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] perf tools: Add new struct for cpu aggregation James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] perf tools: Replace aggregation ID with a struct James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] perf tools: add new map type for aggregation James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] perf tools: drop in cpu_aggr_map struct James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] perf tools: Start using cpu_aggr_id in map James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] perf tools: Add separate node member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] perf tools: Add separate socket member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] perf tools: Add separate die member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] perf tools: Add separate core member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] perf tools: Add separate thread member James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAM9d7cj6zbsVB_DNmH0R9XqVJfXe9bofMwreH+u-BaDL-xm2_A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).