linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] perf tools: Improve topology test
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 20:21:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cj6zbsVB_DNmH0R9XqVJfXe9bofMwreH+u-BaDL-xm2_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117144845.13714-2-james.clark@arm.com>

Hello,

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:49 PM James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Improve the topology test to check all aggregation
> types. This is to lock down the behaviour before
> 'id' is changed into a struct in later commits.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/topology.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> index 22daf2bdf5fa..7bd8848d36b6 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/topology.c
> @@ -64,10 +64,11 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
>                 .path = path,
>                 .mode = PERF_DATA_MODE_READ,
>         };
> -       int i;
> +       int i, id;
>
>         session = perf_session__new(&data, false, NULL);
>         TEST_ASSERT_VAL("can't get session", !IS_ERR(session));
> +       cpu__setup_cpunode_map();
>
>         /* On platforms with large numbers of CPUs process_cpu_topology()
>          * might issue an error while reading the perf.data file section
> @@ -85,11 +86,18 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
>          *  "socket_id number is too big. You may need to upgrade the
>          *  perf tool."
>          *
> -        *  This is the reason why this test might be skipped.
> +        *  This is the reason why this test might be skipped. aarch64 and
> +        *  s390 always write this part of the header, even when the above
> +        *  condition is true (see do_core_id_test in header.c). So always
> +        *  run this test on those platforms.
>          */
> -       if (!session->header.env.cpu)
> +       if (!session->header.env.cpu
> +                       && strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "s390", 4)
> +                       && strncmp(session->header.env.arch, "aarch64", 7))
>                 return TEST_SKIP;
>
> +       TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Session header CPU map not set", session->header.env.cpu);
> +
>         for (i = 0; i < session->header.env.nr_cpus_avail; i++) {
>                 if (!cpu_map__has(map, i))
>                         continue;
> @@ -98,14 +106,45 @@ static int check_cpu_topology(char *path, struct perf_cpu_map *map)
>                          session->header.env.cpu[i].socket_id);
>         }
>
> +       // Test that core ID contains socket, die and core
> +       for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> +               id = cpu_map__get_core(map, i, NULL);
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Core ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].core_id == cpu_map__id_to_cpu(id));
> +
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> +                               cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));
> +
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core map - Die ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == cpu_map__id_to_die(id));
> +       }
> +
> +       // Test that die ID contains socket and die
>         for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> -               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Core ID doesn't match",
> -                       (session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].core_id == (cpu_map__get_core(map, i, NULL) & 0xffff)));
> +               id = cpu_map__get_die(map, i, NULL);
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> +                               cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));

I'm not sure it works.  It seems cpu_map__get_die() returns
16 bit id (socket | die) but cpu_map__id_to_socket() takes
32 bit id (socket | die | core), right?

>
> -               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket ID doesn't match",
> -                       (session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id == cpu_map__get_socket(map, i, NULL)));
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Die map - Die ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].die_id == cpu_map__id_to_die(id));
>         }
>
> +       // Test that socket ID contains only socket
> +       for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> +               id = cpu_map__get_socket(map, i, NULL);
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Socket map - Socket ID doesn't match",
> +                       session->header.env.cpu[map->map[i]].socket_id ==
> +                               cpu_map__id_to_socket(id));

Same here.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +       }
> +
> +       // Test that node ID contains only node
> +       for (i = 0; i < map->nr; i++) {
> +               id = cpu_map__get_node(map, i, NULL);
> +               TEST_ASSERT_VAL("Node map - Node ID doesn't match",
> +                       cpu__get_node(map->map[i]) == id);
> +       }
>         perf_session__delete(session);
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.28.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-18 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-17 14:48 [PATCH v5 00/12] perf tools: fix perf stat with large socket IDs James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] perf tools: Improve topology test James Clark
2020-11-18 11:21   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2020-11-26 13:46     ` James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] perf tools: Use allocator for perf_cpu_map James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] perf tools: Add new struct for cpu aggregation James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] perf tools: Replace aggregation ID with a struct James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] perf tools: add new map type for aggregation James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] perf tools: drop in cpu_aggr_map struct James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] perf tools: Start using cpu_aggr_id in map James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] perf tools: Add separate node member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] perf tools: Add separate socket member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] perf tools: Add separate die member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] perf tools: Add separate core member James Clark
2020-11-17 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] perf tools: Add separate thread member James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAM9d7cj6zbsVB_DNmH0R9XqVJfXe9bofMwreH+u-BaDL-xm2_A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).