linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf arm-spe: Support hardware-based PID tracing
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 23:59:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cjW_=hDkHVWchNFDyqZXbbBwMb224hbZTMsCe34MLL-4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211111074148.GC102075@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>

Hi Leo,

On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:41 PM Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:28:48PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +static void arm_spe_set_pid_tid_cpu(struct arm_spe *spe,
> > > +                                   struct auxtrace_queue *queue)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct arm_spe_queue *speq = queue->priv;
> > > +       pid_t tid;
> > > +
> > > +       tid = machine__get_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu);
> > > +       if (tid != -1) {
> > > +               speq->tid = tid;
> > > +               thread__zput(speq->thread);
> > > +       } else
> > > +               speq->tid = queue->tid;
> > > +
> > > +       if ((!speq->thread) && (speq->tid != -1)) {
> > > +               speq->thread = machine__find_thread(spe->machine, -1,
> > > +                                                   speq->tid);
> > > +       }
> > > +
> > > +       if (speq->thread) {
> > > +               speq->pid = speq->thread->pid_;
> > > +               if (queue->cpu == -1)
> > > +                       speq->cpu = speq->thread->cpu;
> > > +       }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int arm_spe_set_tid(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, pid_t tid)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe;
> > > +       int err = machine__set_current_tid(spe->machine, speq->cpu, tid, tid);
> >
> > I think we should pass -1 as pid as we don't know the real pid.
>
> AFAICT, I observe one case for machine__set_current_tid() returning error
> is 'speq->cpu' is -1 (this is the case for per-thread tracing).  In
> this case, if pass '-1' for pid/tid, it still will return failure.
>
> So here should return the error as it is.  Am I missing anything?

I'm not saying about the error.  It's about thread status.
In the machine__set_current_tid(), it calls
machine__findnew_thread() with given pid and tid.

I suspect it can set pid to a wrong value if the thread has
no pid value at the moment.

Thanks,
Namhyung

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-11  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-09 11:50 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf arm-spe: Track pid/tid for Arm SPE samples German Gomez
2021-11-09 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf arm-spe: Track task context switch for cpu-mode events German Gomez
2021-11-09 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf arm-spe: Update --switch-events docs in perf-record German Gomez
2021-11-11  7:18   ` Leo Yan
2021-11-11  7:29     ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-09 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf arm-spe: Save context ID in record German Gomez
2021-11-11  7:25   ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-09 11:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf arm-spe: Support hardware-based PID tracing German Gomez
2021-11-11  7:28   ` Namhyung Kim
2021-11-11  7:41     ` Leo Yan
2021-11-11  7:59       ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2021-11-11  8:30         ` Leo Yan
2021-11-11 12:23           ` German Gomez
2021-11-11 12:42             ` Leo Yan
2021-11-11 13:10               ` German Gomez
2021-11-11  7:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] perf arm-spe: Track pid/tid for Arm SPE samples Leo Yan
2021-11-11 13:26   ` Leo Yan
2021-11-11 14:49     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM9d7cjW_=hDkHVWchNFDyqZXbbBwMb224hbZTMsCe34MLL-4Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).