linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/3] z3fold: change per-pool spinlock to rwlock
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:05:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMJBoFPeMJFiq1ntLnxa2=UJuTUGi0wOg_+z5vdKrDxPjWZiBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALZtONCAyTJ6pyGx131xhXWBQab-qcexaBi9JXNY2yQwKDq5ag@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:12 AM, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mapping/unmapping goes with no actual modifications so it makes
>> sense to only take a read lock in map/unmap functions.
>>
>> This change gives up to 10% performance gain and lower latencies
>> in fio sequential read/write tests, e.g. before:
>>
>> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>>   WRITE: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=3234.8MB/s, minb=276031KB/s, maxb=277391KB/s, mint=850530msec, maxt=854720msec
>>
>> Run status group 1 (all jobs):
>>    READ: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=4838.6MB/s, minb=412888KB/s, maxb=424969KB/s, mint=555168msec, maxt=571412msec
>>
>> after:
>> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
>>   WRITE: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=3284.2MB/s, minb=280249KB/s, maxb=281130KB/s, mint=839218msec, maxt=841856msec
>>
>> Run status group 1 (all jobs):
>>    READ: io=2700.0GB, aggrb=5210.7MB/s, minb=444640KB/s, maxb=447791KB/s, mint=526874msec, maxt=530607msec
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/z3fold.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/z3fold.c b/mm/z3fold.c
>> index 5ac325a..014d84f 100644
>> --- a/mm/z3fold.c
>> +++ b/mm/z3fold.c
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct z3fold_ops {
>>   * pertaining to a particular z3fold pool.
>>   */
>>  struct z3fold_pool {
>> -       spinlock_t lock;
>> +       rwlock_t lock;
>>         struct list_head unbuddied[NCHUNKS];
>>         struct list_head buddied;
>>         struct list_head lru;
>> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static struct z3fold_pool *z3fold_create_pool(gfp_t gfp,
>>         pool = kzalloc(sizeof(struct z3fold_pool), gfp);
>>         if (!pool)
>>                 return NULL;
>> -       spin_lock_init(&pool->lock);
>> +       rwlock_init(&pool->lock);
>>         for_each_unbuddied_list(i, 0)
>>                 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->unbuddied[i]);
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pool->buddied);
>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>>                 bud = HEADLESS;
>>         else {
>>                 chunks = size_to_chunks(size);
>> -               spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +               write_lock(&pool->lock);
>>
>>                 /* First, try to find an unbuddied z3fold page. */
>>                 zhdr = NULL;
>> @@ -342,14 +342,14 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>>                         }
>>                 }
>>                 bud = FIRST;
>> -               spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>         }
>>
>>         /* Couldn't find unbuddied z3fold page, create new one */
>>         page = alloc_page(gfp);
>>         if (!page)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>> -       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +       write_lock(&pool->lock);
>>         atomic64_inc(&pool->pages_nr);
>>         zhdr = init_z3fold_page(page);
>>
>> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int z3fold_alloc(struct z3fold_pool *pool, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
>>         list_add(&page->lru, &pool->lru);
>>
>>         *handle = encode_handle(zhdr, bud);
>> -       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +       write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>         struct page *page;
>>         enum buddy bud;
>>
>> -       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +       write_lock(&pool->lock);
>>         zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>>         page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>>
>> @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>                 default:
>>                         pr_err("%s: unknown bud %d\n", __func__, bud);
>>                         WARN_ON(1);
>> -                       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +                       write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>                         return;
>>                 }
>>                 if (is_unbuddied)
>> @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>
>>         if (test_bit(UNDER_RECLAIM, &page->private)) {
>>                 /* z3fold page is under reclaim, reclaim will free */
>> -               spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>                 return;
>>         }
>>
>> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static void z3fold_free(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>                 atomic64_inc(&pool->unbuddied_nr);
>>         }
>>
>> -       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +       write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>         struct page *page;
>>         unsigned long first_handle = 0, middle_handle = 0, last_handle = 0;
>>
>> -       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_lock(&pool->lock);
>
> this needs the write lock, as we actually change the pool's lists
> inside the for loop below, e.g.:
>
>                 page = list_last_entry(&pool->lru, struct page, lru);
>                 list_del(&page->lru);
>
> as well as:
>
>                         list_del(&zhdr->buddy);
>

Oh right, thanks. FWIW changing the lock there doesn't seem to have
any impact on fio results anyway.

>>         if (!pool->ops || !pool->ops->evict || list_empty(&pool->lru) ||
>>                         retries == 0) {
>> -               spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>         for (i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
>> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>                         last_handle = middle_handle = 0;
>>                 }
>>
>> -               spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>
>>                 /* Issue the eviction callback(s) */
>>                 if (middle_handle) {
>> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>                                 goto next;
>>                 }
>>  next:
>> -               spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +               write_lock(&pool->lock);
>>                 clear_bit(UNDER_RECLAIM, &page->private);
>>                 if ((test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private) && ret == 0) ||
>>                     (zhdr->first_chunks == 0 && zhdr->last_chunks == 0 &&
>> @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>                         clear_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private);
>>                         free_z3fold_page(zhdr);
>>                         atomic64_dec(&pool->pages_nr);
>> -                       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +                       write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>                         return 0;
>>                 }  else if (!test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private)) {
>>                         if (zhdr->first_chunks != 0 &&
>> @@ -607,8 +607,10 @@ static int z3fold_reclaim_page(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned int retries)
>>
>>                 /* add to beginning of LRU */
>>                 list_add(&page->lru, &pool->lru);
>> +               write_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               read_lock(&pool->lock);
>>         }
>> -       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>         return -EAGAIN;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -629,7 +631,7 @@ static void *z3fold_map(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>         void *addr;
>>         enum buddy buddy;
>>
>> -       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_lock(&pool->lock);
>>         zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>>         addr = zhdr;
>>         page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>> @@ -656,7 +658,7 @@ static void *z3fold_map(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>                 break;
>>         }
>>  out:
>> -       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>         return addr;
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -671,19 +673,19 @@ static void z3fold_unmap(struct z3fold_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
>>         struct page *page;
>>         enum buddy buddy;
>>
>> -       spin_lock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_lock(&pool->lock);
>>         zhdr = handle_to_z3fold_header(handle);
>>         page = virt_to_page(zhdr);
>>
>>         if (test_bit(PAGE_HEADLESS, &page->private)) {
>> -               spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +               read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>                 return;
>>         }
>>
>>         buddy = handle_to_buddy(handle);
>>         if (buddy == MIDDLE)
>>                 clear_bit(MIDDLE_CHUNK_MAPPED, &page->private);
>> -       spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
>> +       read_unlock(&pool->lock);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> --
>> 2.4.2

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-01 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27 11:06 [PATCHv3 0/3] z3fold: background page compaction Vitaly Wool
2016-10-27 11:08 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] z3fold: make counters atomic Vitaly Wool
2016-11-01 20:03   ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-01 21:03     ` Vitaly Wool
2016-11-01 22:16       ` Dan Streetman
2016-10-27 11:12 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] z3fold: change per-pool spinlock to rwlock Vitaly Wool
2016-11-01 20:16   ` Dan Streetman
2016-11-01 21:05     ` Vitaly Wool [this message]
2016-10-27 11:13 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] z3fold: add compaction worker Vitaly Wool
2016-11-01 22:13   ` Dan Streetman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMJBoFPeMJFiq1ntLnxa2=UJuTUGi0wOg_+z5vdKrDxPjWZiBg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vitalywool@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ddstreet@ieee.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).