From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.11-rc4
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:43:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3UGH8Aq-L3CsJ6BFFjZPBG18Gob6_avHMsz8rnrse51g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFy61PbNZda8f+42T9e7TioWd+W1s70UA6h+xnARjX3usA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> That said, Felipe, can you double-check that it's not timing-related
> in some subtle way, and test multiple times with just that commit
> reverted (and not reverted) to make sure that it's 100% that one
> single line by that particular commit? Because it does seem very
> benign..
I tested perhaps dozens of times with the patch, and every one of them
failed. I tested at least 6 times with the patch reverted, every one
of them worked.
I'm fairly certain that it's 100% reproducible, so it doesn't seem to be a race.
But I'll double-check.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-05 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-04 21:09 Linux 3.11-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 2:34 ` O_TMPFILE fs corruption (Re: Linux 3.11-rc4) Andy Lutomirski
2013-08-05 3:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 4:45 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2013-08-05 8:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-08-05 16:04 ` Jörn Engel
2013-08-05 14:31 ` Al Viro
2013-08-05 4:20 ` Linux 3.11-rc4 Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 14:27 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:02 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:40 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 17:43 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2013-08-05 18:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-08-05 17:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-05 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Linux 3.11-rc4) Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-06 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] Revert "ptrace: PTRACE_DETACH should do flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(child)" Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 12:05 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was: Linux 3.11-rc4) Grazvydas Ignotas
2013-08-07 17:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 19:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-07 19:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-07 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-08 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-08 16:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-08-08 16:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-08 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-08-09 16:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-08-09 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMP44s3UGH8Aq-L3CsJ6BFFjZPBG18Gob6_avHMsz8rnrse51g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).