From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AF6C43441 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2529B2081C for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Eom9dVq+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2529B2081C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=bgdev.pl Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728222AbeKIVF6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:05:58 -0500 Received: from mail-it1-f195.google.com ([209.85.166.195]:39762 "EHLO mail-it1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727537AbeKIVF5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:05:57 -0500 Received: by mail-it1-f195.google.com with SMTP id m15so2678406itl.4 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:25:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bgdev-pl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Y7zcvEmrMR7aebBpQCJwpOsJG+lgvUoEtFAQS6mXEU=; b=Eom9dVq+WefCA5ZM6xTRNPyKB8vlv9eq4YsR5ig7oPbVtk8/S3voqrSMCeTuVceqhy +GkdxvYhWk6GxTrroCpi69diR6wFO2pYXri0oVxE450+kp3KB0Tw8NVQnGUCx/EDtFIJ LrwLtAm1O9RQnQtMXhccZkMiB96AWtHaXnlccW+M/pwca3ASy8guXZuBN5OkxJMTIIen AyZJnzDcJb4CYa6o8NzyFMi0Pp1rymZ64pB/hfGP11vBVpC64J0dj3fBoLE4e66mROat mg82VPHON5UiD2E2CsFCzC4o0aXVbVXgmL0J5W/wxb0voTBPai9qkLPeNOIBpzHXg01k YbBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Y7zcvEmrMR7aebBpQCJwpOsJG+lgvUoEtFAQS6mXEU=; b=AXodkWqBLsn4taaCsgZV1K+E53qCIT6noNysH5yuEm0ooySvBfr4kS0tQoAZKSbiJ9 VYmftxjN//ik6mEarO9MvY9zk9oFbsbAKt/I1zQQNrKWhfvmfDyFNp6NWCxFZOMYb9+8 9DG/1MDe2DoS3b1+b8wFlKuEwfYDwnv004BxoXfpY6QDPoExZZNk3lUIq1+xD9ppYHRa E2u8lqlXDZ9paJU43oRerK0n//2F1b8Ps5g7zU90i5W0Uh+Mgw7oyY3EyOnQKe+61k68 RiahcECUwjf1YP26mVI2Wwkui3ndsjpUvj1+brFj4PoggwmZNdb14jhZq9O/RS3QPp6S ejYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJNz4RvQc5HL9P+EE1g01JvM+tKpSiTf7YgJULbGygZ5LgnYXw4 vHNWkfmEA9uJNFYKQ3mD9Ela+mD8mimejtltfrc+zg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dm0lQYmBpbSHmx4ETvF7I6MkHoE7enxE4iEJN837+rWhsvzkx75sRHwZf6zOTaxTYfOqP8G9+8RMlilEeRYcA= X-Received: by 2002:a24:f44a:: with SMTP id u10-v6mr1945472iti.53.1541762745643; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:25:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181108215129.641434673@linuxfoundation.org> <20181108215129.753982396@linuxfoundation.org> <20181109111604.GB26335@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20181109111604.GB26335@kroah.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:25:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 01/31] eeprom: at24: Add support for address-width property To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: bunk@kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable , "Chiang, AlanX" , "Yeh, Andy" , sashal@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org pt., 9 lis 2018 o 12:16 Greg Kroah-Hartman napisa=C5=82(a): > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:48:32AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > czw., 8 lis 2018 o 23:08 Greg Kroah-Hartman > > napisa=C5=82(a): > > > > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let m= e know. > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > this looks like a new feature, not a fix. Are you sure this should go > > into the stable branch? > > Adrian Bunk asked for it to be included as he said it was a good "quirk" > support for some hardware enablement issues. > > If you think it should be dropped, I'll be glad to do so, but it seems > harmless to me. > Nah I'm fine, it just seemed like it didn't really fulfill the requirements for stable. Bart