From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D1FC433E1 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4794D207BB for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 16:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ymm00dD9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730041AbgGUQVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:21:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43494 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726890AbgGUQVG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jul 2020 12:21:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F063C061794; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id dg28so15697284edb.3; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:21:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OHn7hEjFb/8SBXPDh1+DgoRQWsuvdjNe2+U9AyALG4o=; b=Ymm00dD9F2MasO44D8/wTfY1on9EmII3e6c5icTnGDjY49MsIFNKckv4IZwX+ryogf GRb1dqFZQCLJj0kOlfQ+/ioq9eSG3gXCeDvzxIkQ3XhNVRYELEvEWCTRfL41X2oFvkFJ 6B+e20IzO63huP1rpSd2WjArWZ25Qb3gIIWlfNwKP5mOav3z7CoBOoIoQhiYBALvUL52 BYB+4ZQb63i8kAb2LtDh/0/iF3bUWc3Th+eULyeWS+cGaSLe5tkqpkhazu1sKFawBxHm fQZv5FoabAu9gg8akYzMCY6Fw5v7Hb5iimAkyb1YL8YKZPr0UHqJfXw85J3Bl5e2ND/y 4o2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=OHn7hEjFb/8SBXPDh1+DgoRQWsuvdjNe2+U9AyALG4o=; b=o32R44laedXCQoK+YjeInT50P1QspspQ/j9TIEET6qf9tqvrb5rnxYQ/mIUGYgihGf Zk7RMGw/otBjbnOezMldrpt5/CRsJXWVqtcUpSvlTe0xH8U0PPembi5F9Fovat/gdGlI 1xbGVzy5iluOuA7G6KVKox/KTOOv9iDkuaqdGPqWYnEtLEMooGfc5j2m7gWc+YypVYpZ ssyx26b5dcCvtMFQgrOR3Fjp4ZPxURxWmTHI5alqgwOiMQADtdviQPpRbNVH/6rHkRLG nXMYTBzKyNwKEMvf5dj8ikOWFAF4HxBVo0WFNiyzVgJx8QY1UkVoWbDhHXw1iMZrRIXu x6BQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533q43LJthqcqI0IRoEnOJvscHsSb7b2HVWwjpa4RGOjzdRbcXE0 VemRosHxSzjDadPQAcB29eG5Pq3AKa6gP4p2BUno+zTqnZw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlkQdsmXiGVJuT5fBMSRufgvGnNFQJWXPQYp7JmU26Bood8ogKvJRBt/XX6NId4d0K7v9nUTgHvmnJoTuh4oY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:202e:: with SMTP id ay14mr26654583edb.233.1595348465062; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 09:21:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200704122809.73794-1-konradybcio@gmail.com> <20200704130922.GB21333@willie-the-truck> <20200705033511.GR388985@builder.lan> <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com> In-Reply-To: <20200721154415.GA5758@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com> From: Konrad Dybcio Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 18:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement qcom,skip-init To: Konrad Dybcio , Bjorn Andersson , Will Deacon , skrzynka@konradybcio.pl, Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, DTML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , John Stultz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >The current >focus has been on moving more of the SMMU specific bits into the arm-smmu-qcom >implementation [1] and I think that is the right way to go. Pardon if I overlooked something obvious, but I can't seem to find a clean way for implementing qcom,skip-init in arm-smmu-qcom, as neither the arm_smmu_test_smr_masks nor the probe function seem to be alterable with arm_smmu_impl. I'm open to your ideas guys. Konrad