From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 19:24:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZfGtULi=E5pNoLciaedGfNpSdopzyOzFhnzALf+nCciFRUPQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107111642.GF13207@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 7:16 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu 07-01-21 10:52:21, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 12:13 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed 06-01-21 16:47:34, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > If the refcount is one when it is migrated, it means that the page
> > > > was freed from under us. So we are done and do not need to migrate.
> > >
> > > Is this common enough that it would warrant the explicit check for each
> > > migration?
> >
> > Are you worried about the overhead caused by the check? Thanks.
>
> I am not as worried as I would like to see some actual justification for
> this optimization.
OK. The HugeTLB page can be freed after it was isolated but before
being migrated. Right? If we catch this case, it is an optimization.
I do this just like unmap_and_move() does for a base page.
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 8:47 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix some bugs about HugeTLB code Muchun Song
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: migrate: do not migrate HugeTLB page whose refcount is one Muchun Song
2021-01-06 16:13 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 2:52 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 11:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 11:24 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-01-07 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlbfs: fix cannot migrate the fallocated HugeTLB page Muchun Song
2021-01-06 16:35 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 19:30 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-06 20:02 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 21:07 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-07 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 2:58 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between freeing and dissolving the page Muchun Song
2021-01-06 16:56 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 20:58 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-07 3:08 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 0:52 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-08 8:28 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 5:39 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 8:53 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-07 11:18 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 11:38 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-07 12:38 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 12:59 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-07 14:11 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 15:11 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-08 1:06 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-08 2:38 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-08 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 9:01 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-08 9:31 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 10:08 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-08 11:44 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 11:52 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-08 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 12:24 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: hugetlb: add return -EAGAIN for dissolve_free_huge_page Muchun Song
2021-01-06 17:07 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 3:11 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 8:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-07 9:01 ` Muchun Song
2021-01-07 11:22 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm: hugetlb: fix a race between isolating and freeing page Muchun Song
2021-01-06 17:10 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-06 8:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: hugetlb: remove VM_BUG_ON_PAGE from page_huge_active Muchun Song
2021-01-06 17:16 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 22:24 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-01-09 4:07 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 9:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Fix some bugs about HugeTLB code David Hildenbrand
2021-01-07 9:40 ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-01-07 10:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-07 10:16 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMZfGtULi=E5pNoLciaedGfNpSdopzyOzFhnzALf+nCciFRUPQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).