From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>,
sgrubb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 16:19:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVFkNdEirvBDi8wV=iExt9BnCm3KU7+Q8oqhrJJtcnu9Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61c37ca790bc11bc023aea8f9b70ab3098aa30f5.1481626466.git.rgb@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> @@ -1283,8 +1299,10 @@ static void __net_exit audit_net_exit(struct net *net)
> {
> struct audit_net *aunet = net_generic(net, audit_net_id);
> struct sock *sock = aunet->nlsk;
> + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
> if (sock == audit_sock)
> auditd_reset();
> + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex);
This still doesn't look correct to me, b/c here we release the audit_sock
refcnt twice:
1) inside audit_reset()
2) netlink_kernel_release()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-14 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CACT4Y+aG1+91U1PWMTwpE_6vbEuqG7CdLCM1H=3WVJWtz=>
[not found] ` <CAM_iQpVeLvfYV+1jX1ZKOntZim4roof4=>
2016-11-29 16:48 ` netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Richard Guy Briggs
2016-11-29 23:13 ` Cong Wang
2016-11-30 4:52 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-09 6:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-09 6:57 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-09 11:01 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-10 4:13 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-10 7:40 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-12 10:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-12-13 7:51 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-13 8:28 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-12 10:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-12 10:03 ` [PATCH v2] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-12 17:10 ` Paul Moore
2016-12-13 4:49 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-12 20:18 ` Paul Moore
2016-12-13 5:10 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-13 15:01 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-12 23:58 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-13 14:55 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-13 0:10 ` netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Cong Wang
2016-12-13 10:52 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-14 0:17 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-14 4:17 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-13 15:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-13 20:50 ` Paul Moore
2016-12-14 0:19 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2016-12-14 4:00 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-14 5:36 ` Cong Wang
2016-12-09 10:49 ` netlink: GPF in sock_sndtimeo Dmitry Vyukov
2016-12-09 11:48 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2016-12-09 11:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-12-09 12:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM_iQpVFkNdEirvBDi8wV=iExt9BnCm3KU7+Q8oqhrJJtcnu9Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).