From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754857AbaIBQnX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:43:23 -0400
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:61748 "EHLO
	mail-ob0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751295AbaIBQnV (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:43:21 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20140902082929.GA8483@kria>
References: <CA+ydwtoDwQVg_BWrxxdpUyJ7Up60GtxTCLYe_5vFdV2td_kGhQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHA+R7MZCDGRhSf=UuVCGQvNo03wVziZQB_X30rwNf6hmHipQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140829195339.GA9780@kria>
	<1409363489.2980.17.camel@localhost>
	<20140830105821.GB18155@kria>
	<1409599348.21965.6.camel@localhost>
	<20140901210520.GB25543@kria>
	<1409610378.21965.52.camel@localhost>
	<20140902082929.GA8483@kria>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 09:43:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWs804KO4pNM302uc__i90MgUBHODA2cofWQTvCCx74jw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] ipv6: fix rtnl locking in setsockopt for anycast
 and multicast
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
        Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>,
        Tommi Rantala <tt.rantala@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, trinity@vger.kernel.org,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> wrote:
>
> v2:
>  - based on net
>  - keep dev_get_by_flags_rcu and RCU in ipv6_sock_ac_*
>  - remove two ASSERT_RTNL() that are not necessary

There is no point to keep RCU here. Hannes' reply doesn't make
any sense.