From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932578AbcLLX6q (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:58:46 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:35371 "EHLO mail-io0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932221AbcLLX6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:58:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5714bd7468cfec225407a6c367e658478d590495.1481534171.git.rgb@redhat.com> References: <20161212100215.GA1305@madcap2.tricolour.ca> <5714bd7468cfec225407a6c367e658478d590495.1481534171.git.rgb@redhat.com> From: Cong Wang Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:58:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] audit: use proper refcount locking on audit_sock To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , LKML , linux-audit@redhat.com, Dmitry Vyukov , Eric Dumazet , Eric Paris , Paul Moore , sgrubb@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > Resetting audit_sock appears to be racy. > > audit_sock was being copied and dereferenced without using a refcount on > the source sock. > > Bump the refcount on the underlying sock when we store a refrence in > audit_sock and release it when we reset audit_sock. audit_sock > modification needs the audit_cmd_mutex. > > See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/26/232 > > Thanks to Eric Dumazet and Cong Wang > on ideas how to fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs > --- > There has been a lot of change in the audit code that is about to go > upstream to address audit queue issues. This patch is based on the > source tree: git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/audit#next > --- > kernel/audit.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c > index f20eee0..439f7f3 100644 > --- a/kernel/audit.c > +++ b/kernel/audit.c > @@ -452,7 +452,9 @@ static void auditd_reset(void) > struct sk_buff *skb; > > /* break the connection */ > + sock_put(audit_sock); Why audit_sock can't be NULL here? > audit_pid = 0; > + audit_nlk_portid = 0; > audit_sock = NULL; > > /* flush all of the retry queue to the hold queue */ > @@ -478,6 +480,12 @@ static int kauditd_send_unicast_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) > if (rc >= 0) { > consume_skb(skb); > rc = 0; > + } else { > + if (rc & (-ENOMEM|-EPERM|-ECONNREFUSED)) { Are these errno's bits?? > + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > + auditd_reset(); > + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > + } > } > > return rc; > @@ -579,7 +587,9 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy) > > auditd = 0; > if (AUDITD_BAD(rc, reschedule)) { > + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > auditd_reset(); > + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > reschedule = 0; > } > } else > @@ -594,7 +604,9 @@ static int kauditd_thread(void *dummy) > auditd = 0; > if (AUDITD_BAD(rc, reschedule)) { > kauditd_hold_skb(skb); > + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > auditd_reset(); > + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > reschedule = 0; > } else > /* temporary problem (we hope), queue > @@ -623,7 +635,9 @@ quick_loop: > if (rc) { > auditd = 0; > if (AUDITD_BAD(rc, reschedule)) { > + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > auditd_reset(); > + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > reschedule = 0; > } > > @@ -1004,17 +1018,22 @@ static int audit_receive_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh) > return -EACCES; > } > if (audit_pid && new_pid && > - audit_replace(requesting_pid) != -ECONNREFUSED) { > + (audit_replace(requesting_pid) & (-ECONNREFUSED|-EPERM|-ENOMEM))) { > audit_log_config_change("audit_pid", new_pid, audit_pid, 0); > return -EEXIST; > } > if (audit_enabled != AUDIT_OFF) > audit_log_config_change("audit_pid", new_pid, audit_pid, 1); > - audit_pid = new_pid; > - audit_nlk_portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid; > - audit_sock = skb->sk; > - if (!new_pid) > + if (new_pid) { > + if (audit_sock) > + sock_put(audit_sock); > + audit_pid = new_pid; > + audit_nlk_portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid; > + sock_hold(skb->sk); Why refcnt is still needed here? I need it because I removed the code in net exit code path. > + audit_sock = skb->sk; > + } else { > auditd_reset(); > + } > wake_up_interruptible(&kauditd_wait); > } > if (s.mask & AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT) { > @@ -1283,8 +1302,11 @@ static void __net_exit audit_net_exit(struct net *net) > { > struct audit_net *aunet = net_generic(net, audit_net_id); > struct sock *sock = aunet->nlsk; > - if (sock == audit_sock) > + if (sock == audit_sock) { > + mutex_lock(&audit_cmd_mutex); You need to put the if check inside the mutex too. Again, this could be removed if you use refcnt. > auditd_reset(); > + mutex_unlock(&audit_cmd_mutex); > + } > > RCU_INIT_POINTER(aunet->nlsk, NULL); > synchronize_net(); > -- > 1.7.1 >