From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>,
"Cong Wang ." <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxarm@openeuler.org, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS for lockless qdisc
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:48:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXvVZxBRHF6PBDOYSOSCj08nPyfcY0adKuuTg=cqffV+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210315115332.1647e92b@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
> re-introduces a lock between producer and consumer, no?
It has never been truly lockless, it uses two spinlocks in the ring buffer
implementation, and it introduced a q->seqlock recently, with this patch
now we have priv->lock, 4 locks in total. So our "lockless" qdisc ends
up having more locks than others. ;) I don't think we are going to a
right direction...
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-13 2:47 [PATCH RFC] net: sched: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-14 0:03 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-14 10:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-03-15 0:50 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-15 3:10 ` [RFC v2] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-15 12:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-15 13:09 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2021-03-15 18:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-03-16 0:35 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 3:47 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 8:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-16 12:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-16 22:48 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2021-03-17 1:14 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-17 13:35 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-17 13:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-03-18 7:33 ` [Linuxarm] " Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 18:15 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-22 0:55 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-24 1:49 ` Cong Wang
2021-03-24 2:36 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-19 19:03 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-03-22 1:05 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-18 7:10 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2021-03-18 7:46 ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-03-18 9:09 ` Ahmad Fatoum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM_iQpXvVZxBRHF6PBDOYSOSCj08nPyfcY0adKuuTg=cqffV+w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).