From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: fix a subtle race condition
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:21:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXxHk+yFqqK-Hezsc83_mKfbUXr4=jjNnik5DwGscRKUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180614053446.GB18426@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Cong,
>
> If the compiler optimizes the first line (mutex_lock) as you wrote,
> it will reuse "f" for the second line (mutex_unlock) too.
Nope, check the assembly if you don't trust me, at least
my compiler always fetches ctx->file without this patch.
I can show you the assembly code tomorrow (too late to
access my dev machine now).
>
> You need to ensure that ucma_modify_id() doesn't run in parallel to
> anything that uses "ctx->file" directly and indirectly.
>
Talk is easy, show me the code. :) I knew there is probably
some other race with this code even after my patch, possibly with
->close() for example, but for this specific unlock warning, this patch
is sufficient. I can't solve all the races in one patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-14 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-13 23:49 [PATCH] infiniband: fix a subtle race condition Cong Wang
2018-06-14 5:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-14 6:21 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2018-06-14 7:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-14 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-06-14 17:03 ` Cong Wang
2018-06-14 17:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-06-14 23:14 ` Cong Wang
2018-06-15 2:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-06-15 17:57 ` Cong Wang
2018-06-15 19:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-06-18 18:40 ` Cong Wang
2018-06-14 16:57 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM_iQpXxHk+yFqqK-Hezsc83_mKfbUXr4=jjNnik5DwGscRKUA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).