From: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Gary King <gking@nvidia.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: tegra: export Tegra chipid
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:19:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMbhsRScEnZQrO3Ufrop+Me_ZKoZ=Cd7HqeAdDUOTe2dLPEjiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMi=nsKr91uu=QTpJ_vKKhc9GBRHPWd6XEB+rOqph_P+yA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> wrote:
>
>> Other platforms use accessors for this (cpu_is_xxx(), although
>> soc_is_xxx() is probably more appropriate).
>
> I have previously objected to additions of said functions on tegra,
> since they tend to start crawling into drivers as runtime tests
> instead of providing more appropriate detection at probe time.
>
> I can be persuaded differently but I haven't yet seen a strong case
> for changing my mind. :)
soc_is_xxx() is better than spreading tegra_chip_id == XXX all over
the place, but keeping them out of drivers completely is even better.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-09 23:47 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add tegra30 support for secondary cores Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ARM: tegra: cleanup use of chipid register Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ARM: tegra: export Tegra chipid Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-20 23:13 ` Colin Cross
2012-02-20 23:30 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-22 19:19 ` Colin Cross [this message]
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ARM: tegra: initialize Tegra chipid early Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] ARM: tegra: functions to access the flowcontroller Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] ARM: tegra: rework Tegra secondary CPU core bringup Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-20 23:04 ` Colin Cross
2012-02-26 21:57 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: tegra: prepare powergate.c for multiple variants Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] ARM: tegra: export tegra_powergate_is_powered() Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] ARM: tegra: add support for Tegra30 powerdomains Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] ARM: tegra: support for Tegra30 CPU powerdomains Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-09 23:47 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] ARM: tegra: support for secondary cores on Tegra30 Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-15 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Add tegra30 support for secondary cores Stephen Warren
2012-02-15 22:25 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-29 15:42 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-29 22:38 ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-01 11:42 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-03-01 14:35 ` Peter De Schrijver
2012-02-26 21:59 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMbhsRScEnZQrO3Ufrop+Me_ZKoZ=Cd7HqeAdDUOTe2dLPEjiQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ccross@android.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gking@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).