From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753104Ab2DRVtQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:16 -0400
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:47950 "EHLO
	mail-qa0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751839Ab2DRVtO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:49:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F8F30F5.9030704@zytor.com>
References: <1329696488-16970-1-git-send-email-hpa@zytor.com>
	<tip-31796ac4e8f0e88f5c10f1ad6dab8f19bebe44a4@git.kernel.org>
	<CAMe9rOqF6Kh6-NK7oP0Fpzkd4SBAWU+G53hwBbSD4iA2UzyxuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8EFE4D.2040201@zytor.com>
	<CAMe9rOpfPQghra1PQTUwsFOvjgNpzFDEGS5=BbFBjn=HZGL93g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8F0385.5090901@zytor.com>
	<CAMe9rOq7LduF4aLPe9qatedxps4WPCgOHTD=E_Lje4_tu6tyZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8F0614.9010604@zytor.com>
	<CAMe9rOqBd29LKB==NaKscpedRMR1uL_ZhHqSw1HQj-3_d9PSCw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F8F30F5.9030704@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:49:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpPStV7+3hSMifVGcRXwF+X_DzjxgUCPBn_nSWyJiOYfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/x32] x32: Fix alignment fail in struct compat_siginfo
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:24 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Something like this works for you?
>
> Note: we should promote __compat_[us]64 to a global type when we do the
> cleanup work requested by Linus (change __[us]64 to explicitly aligned
> types, with all users that require the old types using __compat_[us]64),

It looks good to me.

> but we need the compiler warning to do that, realistically.
>

I think you mentioned to me about this. Have you opened a gcc bug to
request to this feature?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.