From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C00C433EF for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 08:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A26760F21 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 08:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242407AbhIGIUj (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 04:20:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42638 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241770AbhIGIUh (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Sep 2021 04:20:37 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E4EEC061757 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 01:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id q3so11624246iot.3 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 01:19:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9MXLDJhiY0fcXEg+LnGTR4OLM7jMrz/NHCTwfTLwDMg=; b=ElO/UJxIHNBjrNw3yfn9GFGNJhWRax3Eba+PUZ2fRtFre/HLcwkOVfWXRighUoPjEM 51pdOWhi5deDUkefb5ithDBAYMI1Xt3Ha6kCwxlz2jU3xLR7RY9A2cvZS1TToCOjgiwb G90h5wXsl4q8wEdtWuWhAcFViVGAa6gdHujMmr+8R2+97UhFUYN8BnSW82RzYCS9z25m U3Hbpw/V04VgoxO2f7CU769BkfR4sAUGF4mft1VQBJSWBaog2UPCDTdWjAc5BfTT59gu jjL8bOtXSq9C7rgou3bRoFo0EQUhz/R3Vi7onjxMLCD33If4/Ri4kEThFAQfEbRnGaik JwGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9MXLDJhiY0fcXEg+LnGTR4OLM7jMrz/NHCTwfTLwDMg=; b=AlnzHeT3pf1GJvojcHn4wVJks/g2tb5UXtkj4B4JAv27UlvkkI7Re7KRky6zDkWvEa KDeC9LuAkNiEzUlec0LDQEwbK1l4mqrtUgw1wvpJGZZQ3rogasLEknwDVgWPsChtOpev UTIlEeyXSB91dDDw42usXtcuxwiAh+bfeMpOaypKHh6T8QpQdQtLKiJoj6yWuavHYu2A PcpUT/nvjBENhW+f5TLvLtgYcYuLlk98O4dLYhEbvTqhlvLAz9X4lk7K38BfmfcwFAHr bWDO5bbkqK3WK6IiM4SzYqdGDK20NZLsHhkU4nyjzwlsvLROU7rXrHHRUiT9OGNQJOmq K9Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MoOAhNiJZsLS5QMMoWWXU6PpBywgrp7WH2fCkkR5HRNxa48kl pBhbxICgeYBFbzwX7e9iuronD4d8/ekfP+0kxtBa/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIQXLBjfDY4x2hegViI0I26x9Ldz3+Wvni8m5cPnPark5Q3y14GL2LxjfcnaO2magWZu87krrTNuiTaU5QMBA= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:be02:: with SMTP id o2mr12593752iof.103.1631002770826; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 01:19:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210729183942.2839925-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <1a38a590-a64e-58ef-1bbf-0ae49c004d05@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Amit Pundir Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 13:48:54 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Disable frequency clamping on a630 To: Rob Clark Cc: John Stultz , Caleb Connolly , Rob Clark , freedreno , Sai Prakash Ranjan , Jonathan Marek , David Airlie , linux-arm-msm , Sharat Masetty , Akhil P Oommen , dri-devel , Jordan Crouse , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , Sean Paul , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 02:53, Rob Clark wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:50 PM Rob Clark wrote: > > > > > > ok, I guess it is at least not a board specific thing (ie. won't need > > to introduce some dt binding).. > > > > It would be nice to know what the maximum we can safely increase freq > > in one step, if we need to limit that. > > Also, one sanity check.. for android builds, are you using the same > a630_gmu.bin from linux-firmware? If not, does the l-f gmu fw change > things? We are using the same a630_gmu.bin from linux-firmware. > > For freq changes, we basically ask gmu for the freq we want, and it > votes for the requested freq.. so a gmu fw bug could be possible here. > > BR, > -R