From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] efi: pstore: disentangle from deprecated efivars module
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:43:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFFs2rLMn5kdY9CGsz32ctBshb93iN7yBtZNHYwW2mWnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202009231140.B4648C6@keescook>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 20:41, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > The EFI pstore implementation relies on the 'efivars' abstraction,
> > which encapsulates the EFI variable store in a way that can be
> > overridden by other backing stores, like the Google SMI one.
> >
> > On top of that, the EFI pstore implementation also relies on the
> > efivars.ko module, which is a separate layer built on top of the
> > 'efivars' abstraction that exposes the [deprecated] sysfs entries
> > for each variable that exists in the backing store.
> >
> > Since the efivars.ko module is deprecated, and all users appear to
> > have moved to the efivarfs file system instead, let's prepare for
> > its removal, by removing EFI pstore's dependency on it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> With this and the other pstore patch, do the pstore self-tests still
> pass on an EFI system?
>
> If so, please consider both:
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
Selftests? Excellent! Are they documented too?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-23 16:13 [PATCH 0/7] efi: deprecate/remove efivars sysfs interface Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/7] efi: pstore: disentangle from deprecated efivars module Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 18:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-23 18:43 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-09-23 21:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-09-24 9:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-24 10:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/7] efi: pstore: move workqueue handling out of efivars Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] efi: efivars: un-export efivars_sysfs_init() Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] efi: gsmi: fix false dependency on CONFIG_EFI_VARS Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] efi: remove some false dependencies " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] efi: efivars: limit availability to X86 builds Ard Biesheuvel
2020-09-23 16:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] efi: efivars: remove deprecated sysfs interface Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMj1kXFFs2rLMn5kdY9CGsz32ctBshb93iN7yBtZNHYwW2mWnw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).