linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 12:25:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGE=mu4P3sL-2zuGMrV1QwkXJc+-Y4Pj4RV7YEvdTDPzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511100550.28178-4-rppt@kernel.org>

On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 12:06, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>
> The intended semantics of pfn_valid() is to verify whether there is a
> struct page for the pfn in question and nothing else.
>
> Yet, on arm64 it is used to distinguish memory areas that are mapped in the
> linear map vs those that require ioremap() to access them.
>
> Introduce a dedicated pfn_is_map_memory() wrapper for
> memblock_is_map_memory() to perform such check and use it where
> appropriate.
>
> Using a wrapper allows to avoid cyclic include dependencies.
>
> While here also update style of pfn_valid() so that both pfn_valid() and
> pfn_is_map_memory() declarations will be consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h   |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c            |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c            | 12 ++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c         |  4 ++--
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c             |  2 +-
>  6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 87b90dc27a43..9027b7e16c4c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
>
>  #define virt_addr_valid(addr)  ({                                      \
>         __typeof__(addr) __addr = __tag_reset(addr);                    \
> -       __is_lm_address(__addr) && pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(__addr));      \
> +       __is_lm_address(__addr) && pfn_is_map_memory(virt_to_pfn(__addr));      \
>  })
>
>  void dump_mem_limit(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
> index 012cffc574e8..75ddfe671393 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ void copy_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from);
>
>  typedef struct page *pgtable_t;
>
> -extern int pfn_valid(unsigned long);
> +int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn);
> +int pfn_is_map_memory(unsigned long pfn);
>
>  #include <asm/memory.h>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index c5d1f3c87dbd..470070073085 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>  static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>  {
> -       return !pfn_valid(pfn);
> +       return !pfn_is_map_memory(pfn);
>  }
>
>  static void *stage2_memcache_zalloc_page(void *arg)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 16a2b2b1c54d..798f74f501d5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,18 @@ int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_valid);
>
> +int pfn_is_map_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> +{
> +       phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(pfn);
> +
> +       /* avoid false positives for bogus PFNs, see comment in pfn_valid() */
> +       if (PHYS_PFN(addr) != pfn)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       return memblock_is_map_memory(addr);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pfn_is_map_memory);
> +
>  static phys_addr_t memory_limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>
>  /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> index b5e83c46b23e..b7c81dacabf0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/ioremap.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void __iomem *__ioremap_caller(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
>         /*
>          * Don't allow RAM to be mapped.
>          */
> -       if (WARN_ON(pfn_valid(__phys_to_pfn(phys_addr))))
> +       if (WARN_ON(pfn_is_map_memory(__phys_to_pfn(phys_addr))))
>                 return NULL;
>
>         area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_IOREMAP, caller);
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iounmap);
>  void __iomem *ioremap_cache(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size)
>  {
>         /* For normal memory we already have a cacheable mapping. */
> -       if (pfn_valid(__phys_to_pfn(phys_addr)))
> +       if (pfn_is_map_memory(__phys_to_pfn(phys_addr)))
>                 return (void __iomem *)__phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
>
>         return __ioremap_caller(phys_addr, size, __pgprot(PROT_NORMAL),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 6dd9369e3ea0..ab5914cebd3c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ void set_swapper_pgd(pgd_t *pgdp, pgd_t pgd)
>  pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
>                               unsigned long size, pgprot_t vma_prot)
>  {
> -       if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> +       if (!pfn_is_map_memory(pfn))
>                 return pgprot_noncached(vma_prot);
>         else if (file->f_flags & O_SYNC)
>                 return pgprot_writecombine(vma_prot);
> --
> 2.28.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:23   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:25   ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2021-05-11 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-05-11 10:26   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-11 23:40   ` Andrew Morton
2021-05-12  5:31     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12  3:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Kefeng Wang
2021-05-12  7:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12  7:33   ` Mike Rapoport
2021-05-12  7:59     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-05-12  8:32       ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMj1kXGE=mu4P3sL-2zuGMrV1QwkXJc+-Y4Pj4RV7YEvdTDPzw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox