linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>
To: Marc Orr <marcorr@google.com>
Cc: kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 12:08:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMkAt6qbauEn1jGUYLQc6QURhCHLu7eDmzJhfHZZXN9FGbQOMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA03e5HEKPxfGZ57r=intg_ogTp_JPAio36QJXqviMZM_KmvEg@mail.gmail.com>

> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > index 75fa6dd268f0..5f9d37dd3f6f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > @@ -2735,8 +2735,13 @@ static int sev_handle_vmgexit_msr_protocol(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> >                 pr_info("SEV-ES guest requested termination: %#llx:%#llx\n",
> >                         reason_set, reason_code);
> >
> > -               ret = -EINVAL;
> > -               break;
> > +               vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN;
> > +               vcpu->run->shutdown.reason = KVM_SHUTDOWN_SEV_TERM;
> > +               vcpu->run->shutdown.ndata = 2;
> > +               vcpu->run->shutdown.data[0] = reason_set;
> > +               vcpu->run->shutdown.data[1] = reason_code;
> > +
> > +               return 0;
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but don't we want to keep returning an error?
>
> rationale: Current behavior: return -EINVAL to userpsace, but
> userpsace cannot infer where the -EINVAL came from. After this patch:
> We should still return -EINVAL to userspace, but now userspace can
> parse this new info in the KVM run struct to properly terminate.
>

I removed the error return code here since an SEV guest may request a
termination due to no fault of the host at all. This is now inline
with any other shutdown requested by the guest. I don't have a strong
preference here but EINVAL doesn't seem correct in all cases, do
others have any thoughts on this?

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-21 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-21 15:02 [PATCH] Add KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN metadata for SEV-ES Peter Gonda
2022-03-21 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-21 15:42   ` Peter Gonda
2022-03-21 17:08     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-03-21 17:22       ` Peter Gonda
2022-03-21 17:25 ` Marc Orr
2022-03-21 18:08   ` Peter Gonda [this message]
2022-03-21 19:45     ` Marc Orr
2022-03-25 15:28       ` Peter Gonda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMkAt6qbauEn1jGUYLQc6QURhCHLu7eDmzJhfHZZXN9FGbQOMA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).