From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752287AbdATOML (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:12:11 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34774 "EHLO mail-io0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752009AbdATOMK (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:12:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86bcbb3c-87e4-3508-f4a6-26529f39d374@ti.com> References: <1484911325-23425-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <20170120132843.GA31487@mtj.duckdns.org> <86bcbb3c-87e4-3508-f4a6-26529f39d374@ti.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:02:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ARM: da850-lcdk: add SATA support To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Tejun Heo , Kevin Hilman , Patrick Titiano , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-devicetree , LKML , arm-soc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2017-01-20 14:56 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori : > Hi Tejun, > > On Friday 20 January 2017 06:58 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:21:51PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> This series contains all the changes necessary to make SATA work on >>> the da850-lcdk board. >>> >>> The first patch adds DT bindings for the ahci-da850 driver. >>> >>> The second enables relevant modules in davinci_all_defconfig. >>> >>> Patches 03/14-06/14 modify the way the clocks are handled regarding >>> SATA on the da850 platform. We modify the ahci driver to retrieve >>> the clock via con_id and model the external SATA oscillator as >>> a real clock. >>> >>> Patches 07/14-11/14 extend the ahci-da850 driver. Add DT support, >>> implement workarounds necessary to make SATA work on the da850-lcdk >>> board and un-hardcode the external clock multiplier. >> >> Please feel free to add >> >> Acked-by: Tejun Heo >> >> to the all libata patches. Please let me know how the patches should >> be routed once other parts are settled. > > I believe you can queue the libata patches independently (patches 1, 4, > 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). It looks like they have been written such that driver > continues to work with existing platform code (Bartosz, please disagree > if I am wrong). 1/14 still needs the ack from DT maintainers. > Patch 11/14 depends on 06/14. Other than that I think it should work independently. Thanks, Bartosz