From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53378C43381 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20520652A8 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 08:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229775AbhCIITq (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:19:46 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34692 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229524AbhCIITb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 03:19:31 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F34DC061760 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 00:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id c10so25642058ejx.9 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:19:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ktw6Vy0vKj0+IWZr4PuUcyXC0kFObus7a2EmBpNWdj4=; b=tH0VLSft5rYfI6ehechyQeyeheTGF4WBZ+zVPMOcqhQtUjwdPp/ZIgO6N92PQP22nv jv7WqiKtR4Ey4bLqONv4Cj7l3pDkLs/Ut7+UGvl0J6MV8P/IBpSgq+AWKTRoOM21azGt y9fA0kV7UhDZjTp4r94mkOrBYZxy0UAfHbRrceqBC2ydMnRvAi+JH40r3yqJkX4N1qiZ IAy8wffkslT8wuq9LrR6DpBc8ENsmvCBVL/hdRRKe7oEw5DgjxIvF276O+mp1q1Fw57v SjeBUjPf1gBQ1xzkmpHLkS8xjnd3+tSha2HFaHHjS7fZI/YJ2nXKW8wUl9CVqd937/+g mX3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ktw6Vy0vKj0+IWZr4PuUcyXC0kFObus7a2EmBpNWdj4=; b=bXPM/Y7pQI/snolsGIOito21GLFHbYiVCoBaLYO9EBW9tgAWnPRHJdtPG7/g5FkwER 6Y0jZ3MR33wPdYUew8uRMv4xF0/rZ7ClDdYI++GDvFG1Qd1t48rtqCo30f3Q0L5qYJMP mXj1VE1iQ9s9UaGSl5rXA8UNAXio6X8ISs009fshWFN/PuixD+mAq18aVLtB3g/rhS0T FjERn0f4xSifnxL2p1DAGK+O9WxVWBzIwf4bVoiRd3rB/E1Iy7rbSr4mB6COLrC1l3uK icY5MTJZDKkiKU62I1ki7GhHnDHt6QWxK+j3XKd1JaBLaLLPpEA9adNf25QsYn49wiyl w3tA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ns94KQ4YEPd0VGkmkqL6dRHN6vLOGY1VrFd9FPNoj3cyebmkc we3qLEuGWmd5x2wk/vdFJVB71J7B6qjz2zlBmpRgkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxccaY07lvzI3pyPNA1B4j+TqZ/AgQnJSiW91vnn1Z11jeetk9yG4K3pnXMtESj7nJOyz2L+HZGYHjmyyoztkU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:76c7:: with SMTP id kf7mr18687281ejc.470.1615277969766; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:19:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210304201253.14652-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 09:19:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] gpiolib: switch to fwnode in the core To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Marc Zyngier , Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:52 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 08:29:27PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:26 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:23 PM Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > My impression was that Andy wanted me to take them. > > > > > > > > However, if you'd rather take care of them yourself, there you go! > > > > > > > > I'll drop them now and assume that they will be routed through the GPIO tree. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > They touch a lot of core GPIO code and are likely to conflict if any > > > other changes show up this release cycle. I'd rather take them through > > > the usual channel. Thanks! > > > > Since now we have v4 based on Rafael's bleeding-edge, what do you want me to > > do? Resend a v5 with all patches included? > > I have decided to resend as usually it's better for maintainers. > > But it appears I was too quick to miss Rafael's review tag / comments. > > So, I will send v6 with those included. > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > Does this series depend on patches already in Rafael's tree? If so, maybe Rafael can provide me with an immutable tag to merge in? Bartosz