From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751633AbcLEKdB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 5 Dec 2016 05:33:01 -0500
Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com ([209.85.213.49]:33998 "EHLO
        mail-vk0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751161AbcLEKc7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Dec 2016 05:32:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <689efaa1-d8d9-6937-5880-3ed7a1401268@ti.com>
References: <1480932549-30811-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
 <1480932549-30811-2-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <689efaa1-d8d9-6937-5880-3ed7a1401268@ti.com>
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:32:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJUYksWf-p3KMYZ_oxKWELit6MwAWd7i__6sQY0-_nKOyA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: da850: fix infinite loop in clk_set_rate()
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

2016-12-05 11:15 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>:
> On Monday 05 December 2016 03:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This
>> breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list
>> links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in
>> propagate_rate().
>>
>> Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif
>> clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>> index e770c97..c008e5e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
>> @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = {
>>       .flags          = ALWAYS_ENABLED,
>>  };
>>
>> +static struct clk aemif_nand_clk = {
>> +     .name           = "nand",
>> +     .parent         = &aemif_clk,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static struct clk usb11_clk = {
>>       .name           = "usb11",
>>       .parent         = &pll0_sysclk4,
>> @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = {
>>       CLK("da830-mmc.0",      NULL,           &mmcsd0_clk),
>>       CLK("da830-mmc.1",      NULL,           &mmcsd1_clk),
>>       CLK("ti-aemif",         NULL,           &aemif_clk),
>> -     CLK(NULL,               "aemif",        &aemif_clk),
>> +     CLK(NULL,               "aemif",        &aemif_nand_clk),
>
> Why use a NULL device name here? Same question was asked on v2

Eek, sorry, I missed that.

> submission. Also, can you please make sure you are testing this in both
> DT mode (da850-lcdk) and non-DT boot (da850-evm).

Will do.

Thanks,
Bartosz