From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423669AbcFHJWh (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 05:22:37 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:38861 "EHLO mail-it0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423646AbcFHJWd (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 05:22:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160608084547.GJ1521@katana> References: <1465202936-16832-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <20160606111347.GA1516@katana> <20160608084547.GJ1521@katana> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 11:22:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 00/14] eeprom: at24: driver rework and at24cs/at24mac support From: Bartosz Golaszewski To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c , LKML , Andrew Lunn , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Ripard , GregKH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2016-06-08 10:45 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang : > >> sorry for that. I always resend after a week without response - just >> as suggested in Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > > Wow, do I really have to tell you these things? > > * It doesn't suggest to do that. It suggests to wait *a minimum* a week if > you yourself considered doing that. > > * A ping is more lightweight than resending 14 patches > > * You *know* the lag in the i2c patch review. How should a reference to > SubmittingPatches help the situation? > > Needless to say, I could have reviewed a patch now instead of uncovering > wrong/sloppy readings of SubmittingPatches which I don't want to spread :( > Ok, ping instead of resend, you don't forget patches, I got it the last time already and apologized. Best regards, Bartosz Golaszewski