From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5EEC433DB for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F377964DDE for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229715AbhBEIbj (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 03:31:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60804 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229646AbhBEIbb (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 03:31:31 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B408C06178B for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id r12so10506303ejb.9 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:30:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q+ylPOmVqxiwI3Mekr9xiE5Ov1z7xP6kqenxfg8J3H8=; b=oa8tmGM+AmeFGtvqDJCuZkdvBIJN7ltjyDQe8/Nr7zCn4xfCihxZAlowFHMnUiA4Hh 7K/YRitiR0/G7MpGf/nU+5aemA1UZ7139JzG8SLWaeU+xGOBXuSKk9CUT9KiOhEkcrUg xqb2ITyP7MNpVeM0KUyAK7MrqDV/lBiK/ZRj4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q+ylPOmVqxiwI3Mekr9xiE5Ov1z7xP6kqenxfg8J3H8=; b=A7ud7vEngbezjosb1VnQV9+w5OtZQ3hqliV7qq79uQjmbOI8KkQrx1x97k5iaYFdOj RV0IGfhwjr5W+llsADpPM8BiagIF01XejwUp8JxESC/IndeYPsFyGptBZhphf95sEMPu WOxZvsJdCV6UkomJZdIT77jdvaUSo6TD1y2uYMSuPRuMq/z+6YEYu0ecT/RvZOU629Ff x0uR6TXGICC31fdxZUGBC3s6bT+MzZJSjzGxwlxw7rIkcwf6OvF8P991bQ4QIGz9rqVl to/ZH04Lu/oSMONBwvlzEw2lAH7Q4Cn6uKujI7ZcqoahsSu5OeHUiBL/jwkVqZnr0yeS JSUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530KVhjtCA7iDSeAix5G7F1CG1Zo3sXZK8+YXwxCT+xAMSVEt/k5 XdEJ4kPkOka0cNFbAABqVyCyadOQEs611lltR06uVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrgtcgk1gvRXUJeAHKakFmL/Gl9g9udzyY62k9eYBNyjE7YAy+aSD8k+pxV1stsSIWt2joswrMvstVkMdJkKA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8252:: with SMTP id f18mr3041674ejx.418.1612513848888; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:30:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210203071256.42050-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20210203071256.42050-2-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jagan Teki Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:00:37 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm: bridge: Add SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge To: Marek Vasut Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Rob Herring , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Sam Ravnborg , dri-devel , linux-kernel , devicetree , linux-amarula Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 4:50 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 2/4/21 11:29 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Jagan, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:42:56PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> SN65DSI84 is a Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge from > >> Texas Instruments. > >> > >> SN65DSI83, SN65DSI85 are variants of the same family of bridge > >> controllers. > >> > >> Right now the bridge driver is supporting a single link, dual-link > >> support requires to initiate I2C Channel B registers. > > > > MArek Vasut (on CC) has very recently posted a driver for the SN65DSI86. > > Should the two drivers be merged together ? > > Since Jagan's V1 was out first, I will let Jagan pick whatever might be > useful from the driver I posted, probably the O(1) clock rate > calculation and some of the regmap stuff, and once there is some merged > result, I am happy to test it on my hardware. The DSI83 is I think the > same as DSI84, except with half of the channels. Thanks. please wait for the v3 series, we can discuss further on top. Jagan.