linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@linaro.org>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/bridge: Document the probe issue with MIPI-DSI bridges
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:49:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZBbsSdmgVgwaWuAhGiyLAKN8tLfOUE-MFmRtniWcEAM7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728133531.yzamhx5fhrofxwee@gilmour>

Hi Maxime,

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 7:05 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
>
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 03:12:09PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 7:15 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> > >
> > > Interactions between bridges, panels, MIPI-DSI host and the component
> > > framework are not trivial and can lead to probing issues when
> > > implementing a display driver. Let's document the various cases we need
> > > too consider, and the solution to support all the cases.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst |  6 +++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c          | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
> > > index 10f8df7aecc0..ec2f65b31930 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.rst
> > > @@ -157,6 +157,12 @@ Display Driver Integration
> > >  .. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> > >     :doc: display driver integration
> > >
> > > +Special Care with MIPI-DSI bridges
> > > +----------------------------------
> > > +
> > > +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> > > +   :doc: special care dsi
> > > +
> > >  Bridge Operations
> > >  -----------------
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> > > index c9a950bfdfe5..81f8dac12367 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c
> > > @@ -95,6 +95,66 @@
> > >   * documentation of bridge operations for more details).
> > >   */
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * DOC: special care dsi
> > > + *
> > > + * The interaction between the bridges and other frameworks involved in
> > > + * the probing of the display driver and the bridge driver can be
> > > + * challenging. Indeed, there's multiple cases that needs to be
> > > + * considered:
> > > + *
> > > + * - The display driver doesn't use the component framework and isn't a
> > > + *   MIPI-DSI host. In this case, the bridge driver will probe at some
> > > + *   point and the display driver should try to probe again by returning
> > > + *   EPROBE_DEFER as long as the bridge driver hasn't probed.
> > > + *
> > > + * - The display driver doesn't use the component framework, but is a
> > > + *   MIPI-DSI host. The bridge device uses the MIPI-DCS commands to be
> > > + *   controlled. In this case, the bridge device is a child of the
> > > + *   display device and when it will probe it's assured that the display
> > > + *   device (and MIPI-DSI host) is present. The display driver will be
> > > + *   assured that the bridge driver is connected between the
> > > + *   &mipi_dsi_host_ops.attach and &mipi_dsi_host_ops.detach operations.
> > > + *   Therefore, it must run mipi_dsi_host_register() in its probe
> > > + *   function, and then run drm_bridge_attach() in its
> > > + *   &mipi_dsi_host_ops.attach hook.
> > > + *
> > > + * - The display driver uses the component framework and is a MIPI-DSI
> > > + *   host. The bridge device uses the MIPI-DCS commands to be
> > > + *   controlled. This is the same situation than above, and can run
> > > + *   mipi_dsi_host_register() in either its probe or bind hooks.
> > > + *
> > > + * - The display driver uses the component framework and is a MIPI-DSI
> > > + *   host. The bridge device uses a separate bus (such as I2C) to be
> > > + *   controlled. In this case, there's no correlation between the probe
> > > + *   of the bridge and display drivers, so care must be taken to avoid
> > > + *   an endless EPROBE_DEFER loop, with each driver waiting for the
> > > + *   other to probe.
> > > + *
> > > + * The ideal pattern to cover the last item (and all the others in the
> > > + * display driver case) is to split the operations like this:
> > > + *
> > > + * - In the display driver must run mipi_dsi_host_register() and
> > > + *   component_add in its probe hook. It will make sure that the
> > > + *   MIPI-DSI host sticks around, and that the driver's bind can be
> > > + *   called.
> > > + *
> > > + * - In its probe hook, the bridge driver must not try to find its
> > > + *   MIPI-DSI host or register as a MIPI-DSI device. As far as the
> > > + *   framework is concerned, it must only call drm_bridge_add().
> > > + *
> > > + * - In its bind hook, the display driver must try to find the bridge
> > > + *   and return -EPROBE_DEFER if it doesn't find it. If it's there, it
> > > + *   must call drm_bridge_attach(). The MIPI-DSI host is now functional.
> >
> > There is an another problem occur for this scenario in the case of kms
> > hotplug driver, sun6i_mipi_dsi.c. When host attach wait till drm
> > device pointer found and drm device pointer would found only when bind
> > done, and bind would complete only when &drm_bridge_funcs.attach hooks
> > are complete. But, If DSI driver is fully bridge driven then this
> > attach in bind will trigger panel_bridge hook attach and at this point
> > we cannot get panel_bridge at all which indeed second attach would
> > would failed.
> >
> > This is one of the reason I'm trying to use drm_bridge_attach host
> > attach itself instead of component bind, not yet succeeded.
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean, but if you mention the code we have
> in the DSI driver to make sure we can probe without our panel, then it's
> not something that we really can support. Bridges cannot be hotplugged
> in DRM and having some inconsistencies between drivers (since none of
> them behave the same way there) and between what's plugged on the other
> side of the DSI bus feels weird.

Yes, but for associated bridges to attach on component base DSI
drivers the panel_bridge or bridge pointer look necessary.

Here is the pseudo code for sun6i_mipi_dsi which support the DSI probe
without panel, by waiting for drm pointer to found, but the same seems
not possible for bridge cases.

static int sun6i_dsi_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
                                   enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
{
        return drm_bridge_attach(bridge->encoder, dsi->bridge, bridge, flags);
}

static int sun6i_dsi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
                            struct mipi_dsi_device *device)
{
   ...
   if (!dsi->drm || !dsi->drm->registered)
                return -EPROBE_DEFER;

   panel = of_drm_find_panel(device->dev.of_node);
        if (IS_ERR(panel)) {
                panel = NULL;

                bridge = of_drm_find_bridge(device->dev.of_node);
                if (IS_ERR(bridge)) {
                        dev_err(dsi->dev, "failed to find bridge\n");
                        return PTR_ERR(bridge);
                }
        } else {
                bridge = NULL;
    }

    dsi->panel = panel;
    dsi->bridge = bridge;
    ....
}

static int sun6i_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master,
                         void *data)
{
   ...
   ret = drm_bridge_attach(&dsi->encoder, dsi->bridge, NULL, 0);
   ..
   dsi->drm = drm;
}

I believe some-sort bridge handling in hotpulg would necessary to keep
the hotplug probing happens for bridge pointers as well.

Thanks,
Jagan.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-05 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20 13:45 [PATCH 00/10] drm/bridge: Make panel and bridge probe order consistent Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 01/10] Revert "drm/vc4: dsi: Only register our component once a DSI device is attached" Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/bridge: Add a function to abstract away panels Maxime Ripard
2021-07-22  7:49   ` Jagan Teki
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/bridge: Add documentation sections Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/bridge: Document the probe issue with MIPI-DSI bridges Maxime Ripard
2021-07-21 12:05   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-21 12:06     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-26 15:16     ` Maxime Ripard
2021-07-27  9:20       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-28 13:27         ` Maxime Ripard
2021-07-27  9:42   ` Jagan Teki
2021-07-28 13:35     ` Maxime Ripard
2021-08-05 12:19       ` Jagan Teki [this message]
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/panel: Create attach and detach callbacks Maxime Ripard
2021-07-22  7:53   ` Jagan Teki
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/bridge: panel: Call attach and detach for the panel Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/vc4: dsi: Switch to drm_of_get_next Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/panel: raspberrypi-touchscreen: Prevent double-free Maxime Ripard
     [not found]   ` <YPcFrKLq1dhTcOUL@ravnborg.org>
2021-07-22  9:38     ` Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/panel: raspberrypi-touchscreen: Use the attach hook Maxime Ripard
2021-07-20 13:45 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/panel: raspberrypi-touchscreen: Remove MIPI-DSI driver Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMty3ZBbsSdmgVgwaWuAhGiyLAKN8tLfOUE-MFmRtniWcEAM7Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robert.foss@linaro.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 04/10] drm/bridge: Document the probe issue with MIPI-DSI bridges' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).