From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292E9C0044C for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 07:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64942084A for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 07:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amarulasolutions.com header.i=@amarulasolutions.com header.b="mecH6lYo" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C64942084A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=amarulasolutions.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727962AbeKAQO6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:58 -0400 Received: from mail-it1-f194.google.com ([209.85.166.194]:50871 "EHLO mail-it1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727573AbeKAQO5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:14:57 -0400 Received: by mail-it1-f194.google.com with SMTP id k206-v6so852655ite.0 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:13:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CfajSEk2XC2ZRHx/6xYFW6S3bju4FLuRiQBGRNohddM=; b=mecH6lYowLWX213hhsKc+uO5LuNusq9bUxgI6kjBmKxJTot29rrCB+FVHfbu7ig6H9 t6fqDgr6F44U6FLFLqmMFBKLrG8WiGLpCv8AZjjPlCG849BV2UkDmQwosXe5cONRyuVK 4qzdbsqX0qqBvDL0Exvn1PbjJsAE3iTfv/MpU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CfajSEk2XC2ZRHx/6xYFW6S3bju4FLuRiQBGRNohddM=; b=Os/CS31AO91NeBNgmTG4A31N7qyZ/gAzDxbPiZYWa926OPXoNCv1YlPjD05qDhzUMy 35kgrTwqPnfQu4j2TwHsjb6l3/SihDZ3gGcdMZ+iTh6PdvWj2P0K4WEeNpkLOw+KDkEQ 3Vp3V4O/rz0UZmkwWZJ86nwcWzXAoojQ4JkpjeSbUSdokXbZwjgn39tAU2xFQJkhAsoo TOmNGh2m4bzddshCWTgjmhaINbKg2CO5lBhkXtALACYTBN10mLqoUIy7xvIqAv6aY1pb mBqHnCm0vX+stUspKI5YATgq0MhaTpjb7VziJJA30ESh22zbHCgniBkSaB4534rg59q9 MwYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJyzj7Z2SlqqYx7PdELa/RSmrFiTJ8reJNf3E9WeAX8QgjV3Pbj tKZkbMkcnKBci3DAhMx8EP8sGvAtwKBtYR9Op4Kobg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fr9iE/Fv+KgUcwQ1Wn48VNN+XAWGpUT6mT8pz6U/5EqNyQWOELjTH3hwmxM3uUWTybVv1Cdb0VCteqAhtg+bc= X-Received: by 2002:a24:d0c2:: with SMTP id m185-v6mr4643411itg.173.1541056392888; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:13:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181031183634.29640-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181031183634.29640-2-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jagan Teki Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:43:01 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] arm64: allwinner: h6: Add common orangepi nodes into dtsi To: Chen-Yu Tsai , zhaoyifan Cc: Maxime Ripard , Icenowy Zheng , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:23 AM Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:37 AM Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > Orangepi H6 boards, One Plus and Lite2 shares common > > nodes like axp805, uart, mmc0 etc and the common differences > > between them is Ethernet is available in One Plus where > > as Wifi, USB3, CSI port is available in Lite2. > > You can claim this for pretty much all Allwinner boards, because they mostly > derive from the reference designs Allwinner's design houses put out. Yet we > don't do this for all of them. We do this for boards that are clearly derived > or extended from one another. One example would be the Orange Pi PC and PC Plus. > > Do you have any evidence to suggest so? This is not about common device nodes, > but a common hardware design. I got this information from hardware schematics and from Steven (added in to list), he too claimed the same.