From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753620AbcLHMZ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:25:58 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:36508 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752480AbcLHMZ4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:25:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1481123360-10978-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <1481123360-10978-3-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:25:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oIX5dunwZj3NjQrpxOX6ZZx9jXM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] m68k/mac: macints - Modernize printing of kernel messages To: Finn Thain Cc: Greg Ungerer , Sam Creasey , Joshua Thompson , linux-m68k , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Finn Thain wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> - Introduce helpers for printing debug messages, incl. dummies for >> validating format strings when debugging is disabled, >> - Convert from printk() to pr_*(), >> - Add missing continuations, to fix user-visible breakage. >> >> Fixes: 4bcc595ccd80decb ("printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing continuation lines") >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >> --- >> arch/m68k/mac/macints.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/m68k/mac/macints.c b/arch/m68k/mac/macints.c >> index 9f98c08719010e27..8572290cb93b6679 100644 >> --- a/arch/m68k/mac/macints.c >> +++ b/arch/m68k/mac/macints.c >> @@ -135,6 +135,11 @@ >> irqreturn_t mac_debug_handler(int, void *); >> >> /* #define DEBUG_MACINTS */ >> +#ifdef DEBUG_MACINTS >> +#define pr_irq(fmt, ...) printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) >> +#else >> +#define pr_irq(fmt, ...) no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) >> +#endif >> >> static unsigned int mac_irq_startup(struct irq_data *); >> static void mac_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *); > > I would prefer to delete all the DEBUG_MACINTS clutter. OK, can do that. >> @@ -281,7 +282,7 @@ static void mac_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *data) >> irqreturn_t mac_debug_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) >> { >> if (num_debug[irq] < 10) { >> - printk("DEBUG: Unexpected IRQ %d\n", irq); >> + pr_info("DEBUG: Unexpected IRQ %d\n", irq); >> num_debug[irq]++; >> } >> return IRQ_HANDLED; > > Is this dead code? Yes, mac_debug_handler() is unused. Removing that can be done in a separate patch (this is one of the patches I'd like to send upstream ASAP). >> @@ -319,20 +320,21 @@ irqreturn_t mac_nmi_handler(int irq, void *dev_id) >> #if 0 >> struct pt_regs *fp = get_irq_regs(); >> show_state(); >> - printk("PC: %08lx\nSR: %04x SP: %p\n", fp->pc, fp->sr, fp); >> - printk("d0: %08lx d1: %08lx d2: %08lx d3: %08lx\n", >> - fp->d0, fp->d1, fp->d2, fp->d3); >> - printk("d4: %08lx d5: %08lx a0: %08lx a1: %08lx\n", >> - fp->d4, fp->d5, fp->a0, fp->a1); >> + pr_info("PC: %08lx\nSR: %04x SP: %p\n", fp->pc, fp->sr, fp); >> + pr_info("d0: %08lx d1: %08lx d2: %08lx d3: %08lx\n", >> + fp->d0, fp->d1, fp->d2, fp->d3); >> + pr_info("d4: %08lx d5: %08lx a0: %08lx a1: %08lx\n", >> + fp->d4, fp->d5, fp->a0, fp->a1); >> >> if (STACK_MAGIC != *(unsigned long *)current->kernel_stack_page) >> - printk("Corrupted stack page\n"); >> - printk("Process %s (pid: %d, stackpage=%08lx)\n", >> - current->comm, current->pid, current->kernel_stack_page); >> + pr_info("Corrupted stack page\n"); >> + pr_info("Process %s (pid: %d, stackpage=%08lx)\n", >> + current->comm, current->pid, >> + current->kernel_stack_page); >> if (intr_count == 1) >> dump_stack((struct frame *)fp); >> #else >> - /* printk("NMI "); */ >> + /* pr_info("NMI "); */ >> #endif >> } >> in_nmi--; >> > > I think it would be good to use pr_debug here instead of #if 0. But that > will probably break the build... better ignore the #if 0 section for this > series, until I put together a different patch? Or worse, break at runtime. There's also non-printing code in that block. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds