From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Move enable-method to CPU nodes
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 10:50:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV2VwoD3Le=T4-+Ek2E9tL+hmiR0r4cXxG9EH4GXV-uTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523083746.f4nkz4uhjwfgw7yz@verge.net.au>
Hi Simon,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:37 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 03:29:25PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> According to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt, the
>> "enable-method" property should be a property of the individual CPU
>> nodes, not of the parent "cpus" node. However, on R-Car M2-W (and on
>> several other arm32 SoCs), the property is tied to the "cpus" node
>> instead.
>>
>> Secondary CPU bringup and CPU hot (un)plug work regardless, as
>> arm_dt_init_cpu_maps() falls back to looking in the "cpus" node.
>>
>> The cpuidle code does not have such a fallback, so it does not detect
>> the enable-method. Note that cpuidle does not support the
>> "renesas,apmu" enable-method yet, so for now this does not make any
>> difference.
>
> Is the implication that if we keep the current binding for cpu nodes
> then at some point we will need to update the cpuidle binding?
If we keep the current binding for cpu nodes, we indeed have to update
(common) Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt.
In addition, if we want to add renesas,apmu-based cpuidle support later,
we will have to update the common cpuidle code to look in /cpus, too.
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> ---
>> Arm64 and powerpc do not have such a fallback, but SH has, like arm32.
>>
>> This is marked RFC, as the alternative is to update the DT bindings to
>> keep the status quo.
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> index d568bd22d6cbd855..b214cb8f52e47109 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
>> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@
>> cpus {
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> - enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>>
>> cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> device_type = "cpu";
>> @@ -83,6 +82,7 @@
>> clock-latency = <300000>; /* 300 us */
>> power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU0>;
>> next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
>> + enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>>
>> /* kHz - uV - OPPs unknown yet */
>> operating-points = <1500000 1000000>,
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
>> clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7791_CLK_Z>;
>> power-domains = <&sysc R8A7791_PD_CA15_CPU1>;
>> next-level-cache = <&L2_CA15>;
>> + enable-method = "renesas,apmu";
>> };
>>
>> L2_CA15: cache-controller-0 {
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-23 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 13:29 [PATCH/RFC] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Move enable-method to CPU nodes Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-05-23 8:37 ` Simon Horman
2018-05-23 8:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2018-07-06 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdV2VwoD3Le=T4-+Ek2E9tL+hmiR0r4cXxG9EH4GXV-uTw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).