From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] amifb: get rid of pointless access_ok() calls
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 22:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV78Y2Y_vkvbs2nt5LjM7D9te3ozr71_o2uGoNHSK4u=Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200514174131.GD23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Hi Al,
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 7:43 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Thank you for in-detail explanations, for this patch:
> >
> > Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> >
> > Could you also please take care of adding missing checks for {get,put}_user()
> > failures later?
>
> Umm... OK; put_user() side is trivial - the interesting part is what to do
> about get_user() failures halfway through. Right now it treats them as
> "we'd read zeroes". On anything else I would say "screw it, memdup_user()
> the damn thing on the way in and copy from there", but... Amiga has how
> much RAM, again?
In theory, up to 3.5 GiB ;-)
In practice, 16 MiB is already a lot (mine has 12).
> OTOH, from my reading of that code it does appear to be limited to
> 4Kb of data to copy, so it's probably OK... Hell knows - I'm really
> confused by those #ifdef __mc68000__ in there; the driver *is*
> amiga-only:
> obj-$(CONFIG_FB_AMIGA) += amifb.o c2p_planar.o
> config FB_AMIGA
> tristate "Amiga native chipset support"
> depends on FB && AMIGA
> and AMIGA is defined only in arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine. So how the
> hell can it *not* be true? OTOH, it looks like hand-optimized
> asm equivalents of C they have in #else, so that #else might be
> meant to document what's going on...
These #ifdefs are relics from APUS (Amiga Power-Up System), which
added a PPC board. APUS support was killed off a long time ago,
when arch/ppc/ was still king, but these #ifdefs were missed, because
they didn't test for CONFIG_APUS.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-14 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-09 23:41 [PATCHES] uaccess simple access_ok() removals Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 01/20] dlmfs_file_write(): get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 02/20] fat_dir_ioctl(): hadn't needed that access_ok() for more than a decade Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 03/20] btrfs_ioctl_send(): don't bother with access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 04/20] FIEMAP: " Al Viro
2020-05-10 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-13 19:02 ` Al Viro
2020-05-13 19:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-29 15:01 ` Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 05/20] tomoyo_write_control(): get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-10 0:50 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-05-10 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-10 1:04 ` Tetsuo Handa
2020-05-10 3:01 ` Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 06/20] n_hdlc_tty_read(): remove " Al Viro
2020-05-15 10:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 07/20] nvram: drop useless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-15 10:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 08/20] cm4000_cs.c cmm_ioctl(): get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 09/20] drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-pr.c: " Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 10/20] drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-dma-region.c: " Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 11/20] amifb: get rid of pointless access_ok() calls Al Viro
2020-05-14 13:45 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-05-14 14:07 ` Al Viro
2020-05-14 14:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-05-14 17:41 ` Al Viro
2020-05-14 20:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 12/20] omapfb: " Al Viro
2020-05-14 13:39 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 13/20] drivers/crypto/ccp/sev-dev.c: get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 14/20] via-pmu: don't bother with access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 15/20] drm_read(): get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 16/20] efi_test: " Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 17/20] lpfc_debugfs: " Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 18/20] usb: get rid of pointless access_ok() calls Al Viro
2020-05-15 10:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 19/20] hfi1: get rid of pointless access_ok() Al Viro
2020-05-09 23:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] vmci_host: " Al Viro
2020-05-15 10:53 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-10 0:34 ` [PATCHES] uaccess simple access_ok() removals Linus Torvalds
2020-05-10 3:27 ` Al Viro
2020-05-10 14:34 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdV78Y2Y_vkvbs2nt5LjM7D9te3ozr71_o2uGoNHSK4u=Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).