From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754976AbaDNQcS (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:32:18 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:64072 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754303AbaDNQcP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:32:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1397211951-20549-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu> References: <1397211951-20549-1-git-send-email-miklos@szeredi.hu> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:32:14 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 55bh9q2MAFSgnj6MQdbnLseCq5g Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] wire up renameat2 syscall for various archs From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Linux-Arch , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Miklos, On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > This series wires up the recently added renameat2 syscall for archs that are > up-to-date in the sense that they appear to support the latest syscalls. I > haven't touched the rest of them.. > > Plus three NR_syscalls miscalculation fixes. Do you plan to collect acks, and ask Linus to pull this series later, or do you want each arch maintainer to take the patches for his/her pet architecture? Note that I don't plan to send another pull request for 3.15 for m68k, unless Something Really Bad happens. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds