From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-debug: dynamic allocation of hash table
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 10:06:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVSyD62nvRmN-v6CbJ2UyqH=d7xdVeCD8_X5us+mvCXUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0a0ffa9-3721-4bac-1c8f-bcbd53d22ba1@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:46 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> On 2020-01-30 7:10 pm, Eric Dumazet via iommu wrote:
> > Increasing the size of dma_entry_hash size by 327680 bytes
> > has reached some bootloaders limitations.
>
> [ That might warrant some further explanation - I don't quite follow how
> this would relate to a bootloader specifically :/ ]
Increasing the size of a static array increases kernel size.
Some (all? ;-) bootloaders have limitations on the maximum size of a
kernel image they can boot (usually something critical gets overwritten
when handling a too large image). While boot loaders can be fixed and
upgraded, this is usually much more cumbersome than updating the
kernel.
Besides, a static array always consumes valuable unswapable memory,
even when the feature would not be used (e.g. disabled by a command
line option).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-30 19:10 [PATCH] dma-debug: dynamic allocation of hash table Eric Dumazet
2020-01-30 23:46 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 0:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 12:30 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 14:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 17:43 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-02-01 0:06 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-31 9:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2020-01-31 11:33 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdVSyD62nvRmN-v6CbJ2UyqH=d7xdVeCD8_X5us+mvCXUQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).