From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA86C433EF for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238240AbhKWOv7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-f41.google.com ([209.85.222.41]:40840 "EHLO mail-ua1-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238191AbhKWOv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:51:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f41.google.com with SMTP id y5so44229220ual.7; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:48:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0Fbef1Cr65IM390r0xwl+UzRI+j+QyCypi+gIUcKWUM=; b=HtzboajwH/TqNiwt/QAZ1KYwWW/QnrUgQ9xg/a9SaYQBPl+1rvDQkJZnmlTRxSLZO2 kNY7Nx0GijqdxNjen3gqkq9o98ire3QAiVq/dpqEoWj4IHUFmZxfpcaEpY+9eLuPeFHa bo2yZvWVzl01/F8EWmamCUwNkJ/W205YOa1cotAVJyy3XYLemLO8WtK0V5+3zX3NqB7R nencB4qi2UR99e55wY/BH3JpiwNuSt3BtHmXWdH3IHAlQoweoSXiXLiILGrkItwAHUan vDT/oYsBa0p9G/E0XotxMm6VEk2PI9vJqkjT1NmvcRXN0I0KTulRARU5RTpSWz7KLGxB 2qHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531O8SM9v0TVut681XscXbHt7svYKQeRC6BiBmBuhaQ8nB9ndml2 FtavBGYBcJflaPWU4avGF/Jyem9VKjB8dw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyS6XkSxGVgbrswvmZXDhDhyzXGUKewNbBjZQB5L9F2eYoOWVi1DbK07SxhaTaFByhCaXn8ag== X-Received: by 2002:a67:db0b:: with SMTP id z11mr9183327vsj.59.1637678927188; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:48:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ua1-f44.google.com (mail-ua1-f44.google.com. [209.85.222.44]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s22sm6378792vkm.28.2021.11.23.06.48.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ua1-f44.google.com with SMTP id w23so44224346uao.5; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:48:45 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:e82:: with SMTP id l2mr10294794vst.37.1637678925680; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:48:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:48:34 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Linux-Next Mailing List , open list , Linux-sh list , Stephen Rothwell , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton , Mike Galbraith , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Sergey Senozhatsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 2:50 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:38 PM Naresh Kamboju > wrote: > > > > While building Linux next 20211123 tag for sh with gcc-11 > > following warnings / errors noticed. > > Nothing in here looks like a recent regression from either the kernel > or gcc-11. Except for: kernel/locking/spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'; did you mean '_raw_write_lock_nested'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 306 | __raw_write_lock_nested(lock, subclass); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | _raw_write_lock_nested Which was also reported for other architectures: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202111201111.c2ApGeHR-lkp@intel.com/ Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds