linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	ericspero@icloud.com, jason600.groome@gmail.com,
	Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 12:13:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW7nGxV_3Z2JV_TCM+WtTdYv5P+0cE6Tw=6krcseNCdAw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14ec47f3-f3b8-61c7-2c64-d96d00dd7076@acm.org>

Hoi Bart,

On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 5:53 PM Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> wrote:
> On 8/12/22 03:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > sd_submit_start() is called once during suspend, and once during
> > resume.  It does not hang.
> >
> > Reading from /dev/sda hangs after resume (not in sd_submit_start(),
> > which is never called for reading).

FTR, this issue is now present in v6.0-rc1. Reverting commit
88f1669019bd62b3 ("scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support")
fixes it.

> > Two tasks are blocked in blk_mq_get_tag() calling io_schedule():
> >
> > task:kworker/7:1     state:D stack:    0 pid:  122 ppid:     2 flags:0x00000008
> > Workqueue: events ata_scsi_dev_rescan
> > Call trace:
> >   __switch_to+0xbc/0x124
> >   __schedule+0x540/0x71c
> >   schedule+0x58/0xa0
> >   io_schedule+0x18/0x34
> >   blk_mq_get_tag+0x138/0x244
> >   __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x130/0x2f0
> >   blk_mq_alloc_request+0x74/0xa8
> >   scsi_alloc_request+0x10/0x30
> >   __scsi_execute+0x5c/0x18c
> >   scsi_vpd_inquiry+0x7c/0xdc
> >   scsi_get_vpd_size+0x34/0xa8
> >   scsi_get_vpd_buf+0x28/0xf4
> >   scsi_attach_vpd+0x44/0x170
> >   scsi_rescan_device+0x30/0x98
> >   ata_scsi_dev_rescan+0xc8/0xfc
> >   process_one_work+0x2e0/0x474
> >   worker_thread+0x1cc/0x270
> >   kthread+0xd8/0xe8
> >   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> >
> > task:hd              state:D stack:    0 pid: 1163 ppid:  1076 flags:0x00000000
> > Call trace:
> >   __switch_to+0xbc/0x124
> >   __schedule+0x540/0x71c
> >   schedule+0x58/0xa0
> >   io_schedule+0x18/0x34
> >   blk_mq_get_tag+0x138/0x244
> >   __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x130/0x2f0
> >   blk_mq_submit_bio+0x44c/0x5b4
> >   __submit_bio+0x24/0x5c
> >   submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x8c/0x178
> >   submit_bio_noacct+0x380/0x3b0
> >   submit_bio+0x34/0x3c
> >   mpage_bio_submit+0x28/0x38
> >   mpage_readahead+0xa8/0x178
> >   blkdev_readahead+0x14/0x1c
> >   read_pages+0x4c/0x158
> >   page_cache_ra_unbounded+0xd8/0x174
> >   do_page_cache_ra+0x40/0x4c
> >   page_cache_ra_order+0x14/0x1c
> >   ondemand_readahead+0x124/0x2fc
> >   page_cache_sync_ra+0x50/0x54
> >   filemap_read+0x130/0x6e8
> >   blkdev_read_iter+0xf0/0x164
> >   new_sync_read+0x74/0xc0
> >   vfs_read+0xbc/0xd8
> >   ksys_read+0x6c/0xd4
> >   __arm64_sys_read+0x14/0x1c
> >   invoke_syscall+0x70/0xf4
> >   el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xbc/0xf0
> >   do_el0_svc+0x18/0x20
> >   el0_svc+0x30/0x84
> >   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xf8
> >   el0t_64_sync+0x14c/0x150
>
> All that can be concluded from the above is that blk_mq_get_tag() is
> waiting for other I/O request(s) to finish. One or more other requests
> are in progress and either scsi_done() has not been called for these
> requests or the error handler got stuck. Since the issue reported above
> is not observed with other ATA interfaces, this may be related to the
> ATA interface driver used in your test setup.

I have added debug prints to all ata_port_operations in
sata_rcar_port_ops.  After s2idle, running "hd /dev/sda | head -70"
hangs before any of these functions are called.

Showing all locks held in the system:
1 lock held by rcu_tasks_kthre/10:
 #0: ffff800009575c38 (rcu_tasks.tasks_gp_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
rcu_tasks_one_gp+0x34/0x4c8
4 locks held by kworker/0:10/104:
 #0: ffff0004c0008738 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6a0
 #1: ffff80000a90bde0
((work_completion)(&ap->scsi_rescan_task)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at:
process_one_work+0x1f4/0x6a0
 #2: ffff0004c2b6bf60 (&ap->scsi_scan_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
ata_scsi_dev_rescan+0x28/0x118
 #3: ffff0004c2902368 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at:
scsi_rescan_device+0x28/0x78
1 lock held by in:imklog/636:
 #0: ffff0004c5ee86e8 (&f->f_pos_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __fdget_pos+0x54/0x68
1 lock held by hd/1013:
 #0: ffff0004c06388b8 (mapping.invalidate_lock#2){.+.+}-{3:3}, at:
page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x64/0x1a8

I've just tried with a USB storage device on the same platform,
and it can be read fine after s2idle.  So it looks like the issue
is related to SATA.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220630195703.10155-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
     [not found] ` <20220630195703.10155-3-bvanassche@acm.org>
2022-07-19  9:26   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-19 18:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-20  7:26       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-20  7:47         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-20 16:51           ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-20 17:44             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-20 18:04               ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-21  8:07                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-21 18:14                   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-22  8:53                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-22 17:56                       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-12 10:48                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-12 15:53                           ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-15 10:13                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-08-15 13:49                               ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-15 18:26                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-08-16 20:21                                   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-17  8:53                                     ` Sergey Shtylyov
2022-08-17 19:07                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-08-17 19:28                                   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-08-28 11:52                                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-07-21  5:40             ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: sd: Rework asynchronous resume support Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdW7nGxV_3Z2JV_TCM+WtTdYv5P+0cE6Tw=6krcseNCdAw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=ericspero@icloud.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jason600.groome@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).