Re: [PATCH 0/2] PM / core: genpd fix and pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() rework

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi Rafael,

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 15 January 2018 at 14:22, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>>
>>> I did miss a small difference in topology: in pm/linux-next, H3 has DMA
>>> enabled for SCIF2, while M3 hasn't (yet).
>>> With DMA enabled on M3, it fails in the same way.
>>>
>>> As genpd_resume_noirq() no longer calls pm_runtime_force_resume(),
>>> rcar_dmac_runtime_resume() is no longer called, and the DMAC's registers
>>> are no longer reinitialized after system resume, breaking the serial port.
>>
>> In drivers/dma/sh/rcar-dmac.c, I would try to replace the below line:
>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(rcar_dmac_sleep_suspend, rcar_dmac_sleep_resume)
>>
>> with:
>> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
>
> Yes, that probably is the least intrusive thing that can be done to
> address the issue.
>
>> in case that may be too early to suspend the dma device (which is
>> rather common for dma devices) then try;
>>
>> SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
>
> Good suggestion, and I would go straight for it anyway.
>
> Geert, can you try if this works, please?

Works. Both using SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and
SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(). But given this is a DMA engine
driver, I'd settle for the latter.

And I did verify doing so doesn't break the system without the patch
in $subject.

Thanks!

Will send a patch...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds