From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752644AbdH1JHc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:07:32 -0400
Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:34486 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752510AbdH1JH3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:07:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170824143339.GO491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
References: <20170731153806.GC447614@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
 <CAMuHMdUOoKAB9RXWF3gkEf6m0ww1XrYWL6QGzV6ucLQuOX3rUg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170807170659.GB537256@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <CAMuHMdUGBug70nFxb7C0cyn7u2Q6Yoz4sONDtxHeV9H7stNYQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170823142421.GK491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <CAMuHMdX5dZJjqq0kXsM5_=RSmxKxT731YsxYwu98DR0KJqmzTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170823170805.GL491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <CAMuHMdWs5dPUgnOvEgFcxK57HdxVemgbG+VCfQcDYE4NqiGv4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170824143339.GO491396@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:07:28 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qpIewLWlMF5XfwuEEN-J3wnAcEg
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWnEQ4nL7CqYNwC0b+jb7D5zEyWmo+GrKn-ZM+SiGOK-A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v4.13-rc3
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Tejun,

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:32:04PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > Ah, okay, so it has multiple nodes but not NUMA.  The generic numa
>> > topology code assumes that there's only one node if !NUMA and reports
>> > all online cpus regardless of the node number, which makes the same
>> > CPUs to be reported for all nodes on the system.  I think something
>> > like the following (completely untested) should work.
>>
>> Thank you, that got rid of the warning.
>
> Great, it turns out we already have cpu_none_mask.  Can you please
> test the following works too?

That works, too.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds