linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: pmtu.sh: improve the test result processing
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:36:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMy_GT_FQrXObfebdzipkhzSuAGE7VbGiRuE3e87uH9YcjBrAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109100911.28afc390@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:09 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:42:33 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 7:02 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu,  5 Nov 2020 18:50:51 +0800 Po-Hsu Lin wrote:
> > > > This test will treat all non-zero return codes as failures, it will
> > > > make the pmtu.sh test script being marked as FAILED when some
> > > > sub-test got skipped.
> > > >
> > > > Improve the result processing by
> > > >   * Only mark the whole test script as SKIP when all of the
> > > >     sub-tests were skipped
> > > >   * If the sub-tests were either passed or skipped, the overall
> > > >     result will be PASS
> > > >   * If any of them has failed, the overall result will be FAIL
> > > >   * Treat other return codes (e.g. 127 for command not found) as FAIL
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
> > >
> > > Patch 1 looks like a cleanup while patch 2 is more of a fix, can we
> > > separate the two and apply the former to -next and latter to 5.10?
> > > They shouldn't conflict, right?
> > >
> >
> > Hello Jakub,
> >
> > Yes the first patch is just changing return code to $ksft_skip, the
> > real fix is the second one. However the second patch was based on the
> > first one, if we want to apply them separately we might need to change
> > this $ksft_skip handling part in the second patch.
>
> Ah, I misread the situation, ksft_skip is 4, not 2, so the patch is
> more than just refactoring.
>
> > What should I do to deal with this?
> > Resend the former for -next and rebase + resend the latter (plus the
> > fix to remove case 1) for 5.10 without the former patch?
>
> Let's apply both of the patches to net-next if that's fine with you.
> Indeed detangling them is may be more effort that it's worth.

That would be great, but allow me to resend V2 to get rid of case 1 first.
Thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05 10:50 [PATCH 0/2] selftests: pmtu.sh: improve the test result processing Po-Hsu Lin
2020-11-05 10:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests: pmtu.sh: use $ksft_skip for skipped return code Po-Hsu Lin
2020-11-05 10:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: pmtu.sh: improve the test result processing Po-Hsu Lin
2020-11-07 23:02   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-09  3:42     ` Po-Hsu Lin
2020-11-09 18:09       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-10  1:36         ` Po-Hsu Lin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMy_GT_FQrXObfebdzipkhzSuAGE7VbGiRuE3e87uH9YcjBrAA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=po-hsu.lin@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).