linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	X86 Kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: add workaround monitor bug
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 14:49:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2h98SVcxnrT1z1m+ex+KM3wyYddE3MMpJB9bfdWDf+M=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468867270-18493-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jacob Pan
<jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> Monitored cached line may not wake up from mwait on certain
> Goldmont based CPUs. This patch will avoid calling
> current_set_polling_and_test() and thereby not set the TIF_ flag.
> The result is that we'll always send IPIs for wakeups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h       | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c        | 5 +++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c          | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index c64b1e9..c5097a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -310,5 +310,5 @@
>  #endif
>  #define X86_BUG_NULL_SEG       X86_BUG(10) /* Nulling a selector preserves the base */
>  #define X86_BUG_SWAPGS_FENCE   X86_BUG(11) /* SWAPGS without input dep on GS */
> -
> +#define X86_BUG_MONITOR                X86_BUG(12) /* IPI required to wake up remote cpu */
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> index 0deeb2d..f37f2d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static inline void __sti_mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
>   */
>  static inline void mwait_idle_with_hints(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
>  {
> -       if (!current_set_polling_and_test()) {
> +       if (static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR) || !current_set_polling_and_test()) {
>                 if (static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR)) {
>                         mb();
>                         clflush((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index f380b61..fcd484d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <asm/msr.h>
>  #include <asm/bugs.h>
>  #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/intel-family.h>
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  #include <linux/topology.h>
> @@ -508,6 +509,10 @@ static void init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>             (c->x86_model == 29 || c->x86_model == 46 || c->x86_model == 47))
>                 set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR);
>
> +       if (c->x86 == 6 && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
> +               ((c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT)))
> +               set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_MONITOR);
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>         if (c->x86 == 15)
>                 c->x86_cache_alignment = c->x86_clflush_size * 2;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 61b703c..62c0b0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>         if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
>                 return 0;
>
> -       if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> +       if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) || static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR))
>                 return 0;
>
>         return 1;
> --
> 2.7.4
>

It would be simpler to just force clear X86_FEATURE_MWAIT.

--
Brian Gerst

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18 18:41 [PATCH v2] x86: add workaround monitor bug Jacob Pan
2016-07-18 18:49 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2016-07-18 19:11   ` Jacob Pan
2016-07-20 10:40 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Add workaround for MONITOR instruction erratum on Goldmont based CPUs tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMzpN2h98SVcxnrT1z1m+ex+KM3wyYddE3MMpJB9bfdWDf+M=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).