linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	Gaku Inami <gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com>,
	aidapala@qti.qualcomm.com, pajay@qti.qualcomm.com,
	Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com>,
	wesleys@xilinx.com, Felix Burton <fburton@xilinx.com>,
	Saeed Nowshadi <saeed.nowshadi@xilinx.com>,
	Ionela Voinescu <Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com>,
	Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <Quentin.Perret@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Make use SCMI v2.0 fastchannel for performance protocol
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 15:16:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN5uoS-dgtz55O+AAxEFkgtijpHj_-NSy7SkNRAkhEJN5v4PWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190726135954.11078-3-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 at 16:00, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> SCMI v2.0 adds support for "FastChannel" which do not use a message
> header as they are specialized for a single message.
>
> Only PERFORMANCE_LIMITS_{SET,GET} and PERFORMANCE_LEVEL_{SET,GET}
> commands are supported over fastchannels. As they are optional, they
> need to be discovered by PERFORMANCE_DESCRIBE_FASTCHANNEL command.
> Further {LIMIT,LEVEL}_SET commands can have optional doorbell support.
>
> Add support for making use of these fastchannels.
>
> Cc: Ionela Voinescu <Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com>
> Cc: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com>
> Cc: Quentin Perret <Quentin.Perret@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index 6cce3e82e81e..b9144efbd6fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>  #include <linux/bits.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/sort.h>
> @@ -293,7 +294,42 @@ scmi_perf_describe_levels_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int scmi_perf_limits_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +#define SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(doorbell, w)              \

Suggest to reformat into a macro style:
    #define SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(doorbell, w)              \
        do { \
                (...) \
        } while (0)

> +{                                                      \
> +       u##w val = 0;                                   \
> +       struct scmi_fc_db_info *db = doorbell;          \
> +                                                       \
> +       if ((db)->mask)                                 \

remove parentheses. I would say, could simply remove `if (db->mask)` here.

> +               val = ioread##w(db->addr) & db->mask;   \
> +       iowrite##w((u##w)db->set | val, db->addr);      \
> +}
> +
> +static void scmi_perf_fc_ring_db(struct scmi_fc_db_info *db)
> +{
> +       if (!db || !db->addr)
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (db->width == 1)
> +               SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(db, 8)
> +       else if (db->width == 2)
> +               SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(db, 16)
> +       else if (db->width == 4)
> +               SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(db, 32)
> +       else /* db->width == 8 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +               SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(db, 64)
> +#else
> +       {
> +               u64 val = 0;
> +
> +               if (db->mask)
> +                       val = ioread64_hi_lo(db->addr) & db->mask;
> +               iowrite64_hi_lo(db->set, db->addr);

Is `value` missing here?
Why not using SCMI_PERF_FC_RING_DB(db, 64) here?



> +       }
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_mb_limits_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>                                    u32 max_perf, u32 min_perf)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -316,7 +352,23 @@ static int scmi_perf_limits_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int scmi_perf_limits_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +static int scmi_perf_limits_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +                               u32 max_perf, u32 min_perf)
> +{
> +       struct scmi_perf_info *pi = handle->perf_priv;
> +       struct perf_dom_info *dom = pi->dom_info + domain;
> +
> +       if (dom->fc_info && dom->fc_info->limit_set_addr) {
> +               iowrite32(max_perf, dom->fc_info->limit_set_addr);
> +               iowrite32(min_perf, dom->fc_info->limit_set_addr + 4);
> +               scmi_perf_fc_ring_db(dom->fc_info->limit_set_db);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return scmi_perf_mb_limits_set(handle, domain, max_perf, min_perf);
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_mb_limits_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>                                    u32 *max_perf, u32 *min_perf)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -342,7 +394,22 @@ static int scmi_perf_limits_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int scmi_perf_level_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +static int scmi_perf_limits_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +                               u32 *max_perf, u32 *min_perf)
> +{
> +       struct scmi_perf_info *pi = handle->perf_priv;
> +       struct perf_dom_info *dom = pi->dom_info + domain;
> +
> +       if (dom->fc_info && dom->fc_info->limit_get_addr) {
> +               *max_perf = ioread32(dom->fc_info->limit_get_addr);
> +               *min_perf = ioread32(dom->fc_info->limit_get_addr + 4);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return scmi_perf_mb_limits_get(handle, domain, max_perf, min_perf);
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_mb_level_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>                                   u32 level, bool poll)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -365,7 +432,22 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +static int scmi_perf_level_set(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +                              u32 level, bool poll)
> +{
> +       struct scmi_perf_info *pi = handle->perf_priv;
> +       struct perf_dom_info *dom = pi->dom_info + domain;
> +
> +       if (dom->fc_info && dom->fc_info->level_set_addr) {
> +               iowrite32(level, dom->fc_info->level_set_addr);
> +               scmi_perf_fc_ring_db(dom->fc_info->level_set_db);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return scmi_perf_mb_level_set(handle, domain, level, poll);
> +}
> +
> +static int scmi_perf_mb_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>                                   u32 *level, bool poll)
>  {
>         int ret;
> @@ -387,6 +469,20 @@ static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int scmi_perf_level_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 domain,
> +                              u32 *level, bool poll)
> +{
> +       struct scmi_perf_info *pi = handle->perf_priv;
> +       struct perf_dom_info *dom = pi->dom_info + domain;
> +
> +       if (dom->fc_info && dom->fc_info->level_get_addr) {
> +               *level = ioread32(dom->fc_info->level_get_addr);
> +               return 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return scmi_perf_mb_level_get(handle, domain, level, poll);
> +}
> +
>  static bool scmi_perf_fc_size_is_valid(u32 msg, u32 size)
>  {
>         if ((msg == PERF_LEVEL_GET || msg == PERF_LEVEL_SET) && size == 4)
> --
> 2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-26 13:59 [PATCH 0/5] firmware: arm_scmi: add SCMI v2.0 fastchannels and reset protocol support Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Add discovery of SCMI v2.0 performance fastchannels Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Make use SCMI v2.0 fastchannel for performance protocol Sudeep Holla
2019-08-05 13:16   ` Etienne Carriere [this message]
2019-08-05 13:28     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: arm: Extend SCMI to support new reset protocol Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] firmware: arm_scmi: Add RESET protocol in SCMI v2.0 Sudeep Holla
2019-07-26 13:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] reset: Add support for resets provided by SCMI Sudeep Holla
2019-07-29  9:59   ` Philipp Zabel
2019-07-29 10:34     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN5uoS-dgtz55O+AAxEFkgtijpHj_-NSy7SkNRAkhEJN5v4PWA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=etienne.carriere@linaro.org \
    --cc=Chris.Redpath@arm.com \
    --cc=Ionela.Voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=Quentin.Perret@arm.com \
    --cc=Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com \
    --cc=aidapala@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com \
    --cc=fburton@xilinx.com \
    --cc=gaku.inami.xh@renesas.com \
    --cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pajay@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=saeed.nowshadi@xilinx.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    --cc=wesleys@xilinx.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).