From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753289AbbEHONZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 10:13:25 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173]:33268 "EHLO mail-ob0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753211AbbEHONX (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2015 10:13:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1431092877.21307.18.camel@linaro.org> References: <1431012969-16338-1-git-send-email-ivan.ivanov@linaro.org> <1431012969-16338-3-git-send-email-ivan.ivanov@linaro.org> <1431092877.21307.18.camel@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:13:22 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add msm8916 CoreSight components From: Mathieu Poirier To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Cc: Kumar Gala , Pratik Patel , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 8 May 2015 at 07:47, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 07:38 -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> On 7 May 2015 at 09:36, Ivan T. Ivanov ivanov@linaro.org> wrote: >> > Add initial set of CoreSight components found on Qualcomm's 8x16 chipset. >> > >> > >> > + replicator@824000 { >> > + compatible = "qcom,coresight-replicator", "arm,primecell"; >> >> Shouldn't it be "qcom,coresight-replicator1x" ? >> > > > > True, I still wonder, why we have to have this compatible string? > Drivers are probed by amba_id and "arm,primecell", after all. > Drivers have their own compatible strings for historical reasons, something I've been meaning to fix for a long time now... > Thanks, > Ivan