From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A7C34021 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A2220801 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="CtEJ2Ggz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728745AbgBQPat (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:30:49 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com ([209.85.166.65]:38052 "EHLO mail-io1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727943AbgBQPat (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Feb 2020 10:30:49 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id s24so18832620iog.5 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:30:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Nik+rqycmEDKKNZsQwpz+4ONEq13jMp/wrMWb26VmVM=; b=CtEJ2Ggzvr9hcXYk8dQsXqCegUdOJm67CxgcOD58uMHqi8e5Ia1lcGlhQXPnv46mCx nP9DMji9V8xzBPT+lZbnDXAMujFS2Xj5rlYHy3CKOZ20+hrmqwkJoWSAgsvNXOG8C8bW 9SgvtbhdgP582WK5wIOu9qYAHWu6O+nwyb5jrhOGp5g5B2A3weHU1bKR+iKHONmqt7rL LI4k1jjctb2h0C5XbrdeyrlNyuoNLree2iwOVIwfeKtxS1f168LetLE/s2NtPcCFDbWM TiA+uqf9tOA/qLnRE0gLSpbeJrHcmdtxCgBlNdtIScDlJNSx67PP9YrR19VLlvlonKQ8 FpIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nik+rqycmEDKKNZsQwpz+4ONEq13jMp/wrMWb26VmVM=; b=qlnlSgkmpu0lJlsQBiA97282W9EyAHJZY1dLpXJJ0E8FXUFevleCRWiTacVyQvwwJc kSsvKdZpCZipPQgn5aVRJpSyoB15hiavZKLdOLp0bn6V7Bmp5xPXD23t4Crj+RoZcySQ Md2XC3NbVGIHEtMaS9zemuO8RRRdQTY5gWmnmTOZDj/T5K/kIuOB+FVKpNYFyljYgnmx 43kyTFrMSC9WV7M9USxelmOnvwlyuGpexBte7B9v/JzIfWBrjd5XRxNIOXw+/NMZYWcR mvz6b/5O8LdkpYK9zcLsJC75jrIrp8eftibjChnR6X8trR9LPyXFBPpOrrLVNjZJb/Ep 6uEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNd+RJ4DF9ASQ+bAJ7P9nWq2NBguY9IhZhd5+B7yD4lQq58JWo qcs6mlBLO2H2Pe4XApPyrBzFctafVmaQBjbXkRb/7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzHpRlg0LlI1yFuBVsd7lVhW3uS5OLSUwYHwPAFqz6TG8K3maLTPKkD9BpY2TRYeSPAy4WXzL0PDSzQ1SOLHdo= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9b94:: with SMTP id r20mr12244922iom.140.1581953448514; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 07:30:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200213094204.2568-1-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20200215032259.GA21048@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> In-Reply-To: <20200215032259.GA21048@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> From: Mathieu Poirier Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:30:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] perf cs-etm: Fix synthesizing instruction samples To: Leo Yan Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , Robert Walker , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Coresight ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Leo Yan wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 05:41:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > This patch series is to address issues for synthesizing instruction > > samples, especially when the instruction sample period is small enough, > > the current logic cannot synthesize multiple instruction samples within > > one instruction range packet. > > Thanks a lot for Mike's review. > > Hi Mathieu/Suzuki, I'd like get your green light before we can ask > Arnaldo to help merge this patch set. Thanks! At the very least, please wait 10 days before pinging maintainers about patch reviews. I have never failed to review coresight patches and this time is no different. > > Leo