From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752369AbbEGO7Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 10:59:24 -0400 Received: from mail-vn0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:42576 "EHLO mail-vn0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751933AbbEGO7U (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2015 10:59:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <554B4BB6.2040302@roeck-us.net> References: <20150502190119.666291882@linuxfoundation.org> <20150505221038.GB22408@kroah.com> <554B4BB6.2040302@roeck-us.net> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 07:59:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review From: Tyler Baker To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Andrew Morton , shuah.kh@samsung.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, Mike Turquette Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7 May 2015 at 04:25, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 05/06/2015 10:25 PM, Tyler Baker wrote: >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> On 5 May 2015 at 15:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 09:00:22PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>> >>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release. >>>> There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>> let me know. >>>> >>>> Responses should be made by Mon May 4 18:59:31 UTC 2015. >>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>> >>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>> >>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc1.gz >>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> >>> -rc2 is out now that should work properly: >>> >>> >>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.19.7-rc2.gz >> >> >> The kernelci.org robot reported new boot failures in v3.19.7 on a >> variety of at91 boards[1][2][3]. I instructed the robot perform a boot >> bisection which yielded... >> > > Can one of those boards be emulated with qemu, by any chance ? With qemu-system 2.2... 'qemu-system-arm -machine help' does not list any at91 based machine types. :( > > Guenter > Cheers, Tyler