From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, boqun.feng@gmail.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 20:08:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CwXLsNrC59g6tZk=U+T0Scn_O=b60NPESJXU6uaP7-AsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14a24854-9787-e4a1-c9a8-76eba4e97301@redhat.com>
2016-07-06 18:44 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:43:07AM -0400, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>>> change fomr v1:
>>> a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted
>>> skip mahcine type check on ppc, and add config. remove dedicated macro.
>>> add one patch to drop overload of rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>>> add more comments
>>> thanks boqun and Peter's suggestion.
>>>
>>> This patch set aims to fix lock holder preemption issues.
>>>
>>> test-case:
>>> perf record -a perf bench sched messaging -g 400 -p && perf report
>>>
>>> 18.09% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] osq_lock
>>> 12.28% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] rwsem_spin_on_owner
>>> 5.27% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_unlock
>>> 3.89% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] wait_consider_task
>>> 3.64% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] _raw_write_lock_irq
>>> 3.41% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner.is
>>> 2.49% sched-messaging [kernel.vmlinux] [k] system_call
>>>
>>> We introduce interface bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu) and use it in some spin
>>> loops of osq_lock, rwsem_spin_on_owner and mutex_spin_on_owner.
>>> These spin_on_onwer variant also cause rcu stall before we apply this patch set
>>>
>>
>> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this?
>
> If it's just for spin loops, you can check if the version field in the
> steal time structure has changed.
Steal time will not be updated until ahead of next vmentry except
wrmsr MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME. So it can't represent it is preempted
currently, right?
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-28 14:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/spinlock: support vcpu preempted check Pan Xinhui
2016-07-05 9:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 4:58 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 6:46 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 8:32 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-06 10:18 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:54 ` Balbir Singh
2016-07-15 15:35 ` Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] locking/osq: Drop the overload of osq_lock() Pan Xinhui
2016-06-28 14:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kernel/locking: Drop the overload of {mutex,rwsem}_spin_on_owner Pan Xinhui
2016-07-06 6:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 7:47 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 8:38 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-06 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 16:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-06 10:05 ` xinhui
2016-07-06 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-06 12:08 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2016-07-06 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 13:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 8:48 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 10:12 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 10:27 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-07-07 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-07 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-11 15:10 ` Waiman Long
2016-07-12 4:16 ` Juergen Gross
2016-07-12 18:16 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANRm+CwXLsNrC59g6tZk=U+T0Scn_O=b60NPESJXU6uaP7-AsA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).