linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: reduce pvclock_gtod_sync_lock critical sections
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:41:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CxiN0DPJMCoYzeQ5FMCfw8Cyp0CvGftFs68dz+-rrTCiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330165958.3094759-2-pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 01:02, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There is no need to include changes to vcpu->requests into
> the pvclock_gtod_sync_lock critical section.  The changes to
> the shared data structures (in pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy)
> already occur under the lock.
>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fe806e894212..0a83eff40b43 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2562,10 +2562,12 @@ static void kvm_gen_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
>
>         kvm_hv_invalidate_tsc_page(kvm);
>
> -       spin_lock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>         kvm_make_mclock_inprogress_request(kvm);
> +
>         /* no guest entries from this point */
> +       spin_lock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>         pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy(kvm);
> +       spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>
>         kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>                 kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
> @@ -2573,8 +2575,6 @@ static void kvm_gen_update_masterclock(struct kvm *kvm)
>         /* guest entries allowed */
>         kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
>                 kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_MCLOCK_INPROGRESS, vcpu);
> -
> -       spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>  #endif
>  }
>
> @@ -7740,16 +7740,14 @@ static void kvm_hyperv_tsc_notifier(void)
>                 struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
>
>                 spin_lock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
> -
>                 pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy(kvm);
> +               spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>
>                 kvm_for_each_vcpu(cpu, vcpu, kvm)
>                         kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu);
>
>                 kvm_for_each_vcpu(cpu, vcpu, kvm)
>                         kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_MCLOCK_INPROGRESS, vcpu);
> -
> -               spin_unlock(&ka->pvclock_gtod_sync_lock);
>         }
>         mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
>  }
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30 16:59 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: fix lockdep splat due to Xen runstate update Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 16:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: reduce pvclock_gtod_sync_lock critical sections Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  1:41   ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2021-04-07 17:40   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-08  8:15     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-08 12:00       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-04-08 12:25         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-30 16:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: disable interrupts while pvclock_gtod_sync_lock is taken Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31  1:41   ` Wanpeng Li
2021-04-01 15:27   ` [EXTERNAL] " David Woodhouse
2021-04-01 16:36     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-23 19:33   ` David Woodhouse
2021-10-23 20:29     ` [PATCH] KVM: x86: switch pvclock_gtod_sync_lock to a raw spinlock David Woodhouse
2021-10-25 12:15       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANRm+CxiN0DPJMCoYzeQ5FMCfw8Cyp0CvGftFs68dz+-rrTCiw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).