From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758005AbcGKHZh (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:25:37 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:34571 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757969AbcGKHZf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:25:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <146608183552.21905.15924473394414832071.stgit@buzz> References: <146608183552.21905.15924473394414832071.stgit@buzz> From: Wanpeng Li Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:25:34 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: do not announce throttled next buddy in dequeue_task_fair To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2016-06-16 20:57 GMT+08:00 Konstantin Khlebnikov : > Hierarchy could be already throttled at this point. Throttled next > buddy could trigger null pointer dereference in pick_next_task_fair(). There is cfs_rq->next check in pick_next_entity(), so how can null pointer dereference happen? Regards, Wanpeng Li