From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
quentin.perret@linaro.org, chris.redpath@arm.com,
steven.sistare@oracle.com, subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com,
songliubraving@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] sched/fair: Fallback to sched-idle CPU in absence of idle CPUs
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 11:50:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANRm+Cytg1hDjxM6oxNyTNWztQdCSpaCoUy7KO8zmrv-muABLw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1561523542.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 13:07, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We try to find an idle CPU to run the next task, but in case we don't
> find an idle CPU it is better to pick a CPU which will run the task the
> soonest, for performance reason.
>
> A CPU which isn't idle but has only SCHED_IDLE activity queued on it
> should be a good target based on this criteria as any normal fair task
> will most likely preempt the currently running SCHED_IDLE task
> immediately. In fact, choosing a SCHED_IDLE CPU over a fully idle one
> shall give better results as it should be able to run the task sooner
> than an idle CPU (which requires to be woken up from an idle state).
>
> This patchset updates both fast and slow paths with this optimization.
>
> Testing is done with the help of rt-app currently and here are the
> details:
>
> - Tested on Octacore Hikey platform (all CPUs change frequency
> together).
>
> - rt-app json [1] creates few tasks and we monitor the scheduling
> latency for them by looking at "wu_lat" field (usec).
>
> - The histograms are created using
> https://github.com/adkein/textogram: textogram -a 0 -z 1000 -n 10
>
> - the stats are accumulated using: https://github.com/nferraz/st
Hi Viresh,
Thanks for the great work! Could you give the whole commad-line for us testing?
Wanpeng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 3:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-26 5:06 [PATCH V3 0/2] sched/fair: Fallback to sched-idle CPU in absence of idle CPUs Viresh Kumar
2019-06-26 5:06 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] sched: Start tracking SCHED_IDLE tasks count in cfs_rq Viresh Kumar
2019-07-25 16:15 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2019-06-26 5:06 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] sched/fair: Fallback to sched-idle CPU if idle CPU isn't found Viresh Kumar
2019-06-29 1:16 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2019-07-01 8:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-01 22:08 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2019-07-02 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-02 16:32 ` Subhra Mazumdar
2019-07-25 16:16 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Fall back " tip-bot for Viresh Kumar
2019-07-01 13:43 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] sched/fair: Fallback to sched-idle CPU in absence of idle CPUs Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-03 9:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-09 3:50 ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2019-12-10 6:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-12-10 11:15 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CANRm+Cytg1hDjxM6oxNyTNWztQdCSpaCoUy7KO8zmrv-muABLw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quentin.perret@linaro.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).