linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Guy,
	Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: iwlagn is getting even worse with 3.3-rc1
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:58:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANUX_P1CN0Ud5ZO4AMcvMSUsrsEABRHkgy42Di45n96mB64Ynw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120222003747.GA9808@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:37, Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
>
> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> sorry to come back soo late to that matter ... I was *really* busy
> with real work.
>
> On Do, 26 Jan 2012, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fr, 27 Jan 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > >> First tests are promising, after reboot it was working immediately
> > >> without need to rfkill block/unblock. lso after suspend and resume.
> > >>
> > >> Will test more the next days and report back.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, at the university it is still a complete no-go.
> > > Usually the connection works for a short time, then breaks down.
> > > After that even unloading and loading the module did not reactivate
> > > it, I cannot get a connection at all. But other units, or with
> > > older kernel (it was 2.6.3X AFAIR) it was working without a glitch.
> > >
> > > I uploaded a syslog output including kernel and network manager logs
> > > to
> > >        http://www.logic.at/people/preining/syslog.log
> > > (new one). This shows a session from loading the module up to giving
> > > up.
> > >
> >
> > I glanced at the logs, and they look healthy from the wifi driver
> > side. You just don't get any reply to DHCP_DISCOVER apparently... can
> > you get a sniffer ?
> > I am pretty sure that the packet in sent in the air, but if you can
> > get a capture of that we could check that out.
>
> I still see that, on 3.3-rc4, and it is the same as usual. The interface
> believes it is up and connected, but nothing works.
>
> I am *100%* sure that this is related to the driver, because in old
> revisions (somewhen around 2.6.27 or so) it was working without
> any problem, and when it started I reported it long time ago.
>
> Anyway, today it was really hopeless again, and the exact time it always
> hangs is when the kernel driver spits out:
>        Rx A-MPDU request on tid 0 result 0
> and with debugging on I get in addition:
>        ieee80211 phy3: release an RX reorder frame due to timeout on
> earlier frames
> that is where it all goes down the gully, without any reaction from the
> outside world suddenly. Before ping was running, then off.
>
> I uploaded a new syslog.log in the above location that shows 5 min
> or so of trial and error.

>From the log, I can see that we have a lot of "passive channel
failures". Can you try to disable 11n (module_parameter) ?
Please also try with debug=0xc0000000

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-24  1:36 iwlagn is getting even worse with 3.3-rc1 Norbert Preining
2012-01-24  4:47 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-25  0:22   ` Norbert Preining
2012-01-25  5:32     ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-26  0:37       ` Norbert Preining
2012-01-26  5:49         ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-26 21:13           ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-26 23:25             ` Norbert Preining
2012-01-27  0:06               ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-01-31  2:41                 ` Dave Jones
2012-02-01 15:43                   ` Dave Jones
2012-02-01 14:45                     ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2012-01-27  1:50               ` Norbert Preining
2012-01-27  3:11                 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-02-22  0:37                   ` Norbert Preining
2012-02-22  6:58                     ` Emmanuel Grumbach [this message]
2012-02-22  8:40                     ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-22  8:54                       ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-02-23  7:06                         ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-27  8:36                           ` Norbert Preining
2012-02-27 18:01                             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2012-02-27 22:42                               ` Norbert Preining
2012-03-13 23:39                               ` Norbert Preining
2012-02-22  8:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-02-27 10:00 ` Matthew Turnbull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANUX_P1CN0Ud5ZO4AMcvMSUsrsEABRHkgy42Di45n96mB64Ynw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=egrumbach@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=preining@logic.at \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).