linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 09:29:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANgfPd9GMZgfHxkgGxERrqLwP2aHYMK_yxyrDjCfjao3fvf7oQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97d085a0-185d-2546-f32e-ea1c55579ba0@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:47 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 06.05.21 20:42, Ben Gardon wrote:
> > Small refactor to facilitate allocating rmaps for all memslots at once.
> >
> > No functional change expected.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
> > ---
> >   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >   1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index 5bcf07465c47..fc32a7dbe4c4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -10842,10 +10842,37 @@ void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> >       kvm_page_track_free_memslot(slot);
> >   }
> >
> > +static int alloc_memslot_rmap(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +                           unsigned long npages)
>
> I'd have called the functions memslot_rmap_alloc() and memslot_rmap_free()
>
>
> > +{
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> > +             int lpages;
> > +             int level = i + 1;
> > +
> > +             lpages = gfn_to_index(slot->base_gfn + npages - 1,
> > +                                   slot->base_gfn, level) + 1;
> > +
> > +             slot->arch.rmap[i] =
> > +                     kvcalloc(lpages, sizeof(*slot->arch.rmap[i]),
> > +                              GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > +             if (!slot->arch.rmap[i])
> > +                     goto out_free;
>
> you can just avoid the goto here and do the free_memslot_rmap() right away.

Oh good catch. I'll incorporate your suggestions in v4.

>
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +
> > +out_free:
> > +     free_memslot_rmap(slot);
> > +     return -ENOMEM;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >                                     unsigned long npages)
> >   {
> >       int i;
> > +     int r;
> >
> >       /*
> >        * Clear out the previous array pointers for the KVM_MR_MOVE case.  The
> > @@ -10854,7 +10881,11 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >        */
> >       memset(&slot->arch, 0, sizeof(slot->arch));
> >
> > -     for (i = 0; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> > +     r = alloc_memslot_rmap(slot, npages);
> > +     if (r)
> > +             return r;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 1; i < KVM_NR_PAGE_SIZES; ++i) {
> >               struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> >               unsigned long ugfn;
> >               int lpages;
> > @@ -10863,14 +10894,6 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >               lpages = gfn_to_index(slot->base_gfn + npages - 1,
> >                                     slot->base_gfn, level) + 1;
> >
> > -             slot->arch.rmap[i] =
> > -                     kvcalloc(lpages, sizeof(*slot->arch.rmap[i]),
> > -                              GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> > -             if (!slot->arch.rmap[i])
> > -                     goto out_free;
> > -             if (i == 0)
> > -                     continue;
> > -
> >               linfo = kvcalloc(lpages, sizeof(*linfo), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> >               if (!linfo)
> >                       goto out_free;
> >
>
> apart from that LGTM
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-10 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 18:42 [PATCH v3 0/8] Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-10 16:29     ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: mmu: Refactor memslot copy Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: mmu: Add slots_arch_lock for memslot arch fields Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a field to control memslot rmap allocation Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:44   ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  7:50     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-07  8:28     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:14       ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-10 16:33         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 16:37           ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Skip rmap operations if rmaps not allocated Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:07   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect rmaps independently with SRCU Ben Gardon
2021-05-06 23:58   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  0:56   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  8:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 17:45     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-10 17:53       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-10 18:28         ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-11 16:22           ` Ben Gardon
2021-05-11 16:45             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-06 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps Ben Gardon
2021-05-07  1:10   ` kernel test robot
2021-05-07  8:28   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-07  7:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] " David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANgfPd9GMZgfHxkgGxERrqLwP2aHYMK_yxyrDjCfjao3fvf7oQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhukeqian1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).