From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C99AC433F4 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA832150F for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 23:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="smryyW12" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3DA832150F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732329AbeITElN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:41:13 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f194.google.com ([209.85.216.194]:42007 "EHLO mail-qt0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbeITElN (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:41:13 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f194.google.com with SMTP id z8-v6so6760171qto.9; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:01:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qbSUPQRqa3B4lO113dE2veQeSWz9ghrO/P/n8MCXexo=; b=smryyW12V2itOEnwacPqe8Y7XjLnqQ3zM/Q1Bhah4Zo98HVINlCm1UveDfnETGhVs3 j1DyWX7/6e1kSPauEV7Jv7erdQMdKnLgS6ndIZpOPgYgVCSoS1M6KtquU48NWzywIAbK XN0pQ/arx9ys918Xa+bC0IUQSYrNfeKxqEGr/LkLC1+Ds+XzGJrOhgWQ6rac2nkXOBML LbUpfYkTulgvdSduj7TxZncwiGXe7mvVvlJ4lZezV2zrln6eScQGMr/eGMkwV4kecrss 652DIVAJ2WtU48E5ifqJzSvuxpYbWEvSCvC+FDeQfUoQNSFMFBkN6ZjoQ3mJIjXhBngt NPEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qbSUPQRqa3B4lO113dE2veQeSWz9ghrO/P/n8MCXexo=; b=dlJtlR1OFPjnfSzkat3HmlXg5xJKPUOrJ679cZlz4Dj1+uP68ZdN1geetsuF/vUBPo khC4LXon5U8fNdZVACma61NVSKZ63sKmTeo3y8CZq/D2CslXtsInr2tOi30vRlcKFzsA PDkBEvAU3yGEpKs5unyNL1opgIo/knjJschET9HOMHg44J9YOb7YHCjHq9s9KnAMjkR5 BW8pI4fBIl8FXVgkoHJq081Ht+GzwuWJ/ke7pSt+ZsmbtUDUb2vppFHIsvk4avYhFYZM pOZLBu0DmfeuGxt15RH9ScqZtZwQWnJoI5t9T/b2wOuNx0DwcVkMoxt0/KpD/ZgPqaML 1xtg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Dq3UScvPtOdZya0KUOVpl8HPespTooPP9rP29oXsiJC5kqVA0K kgCfumziMMi87PF/2u2nZ0tQOUruYmJ58CyMLcA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdabsS+wJ9qjr7GqM61eBUwjlAkPZG5gdNUzhyNhCf3oQ9j9Q9aVkjRgt9F+4lP968jZsr+QL4JQSLV98wj1jgs= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:350f:: with SMTP id y15-v6mr26698230qtb.241.1537398062488; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:01:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:ac8:7494:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:00:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20180919211458.GA8757@kroah.com> References: <20180918165542.4691-1-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20180918165542.4691-3-miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> <20180918173428.GA21591@kroah.com> <20180919211458.GA8757@kroah.com> From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 01:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Compiler Attributes: naked can be shared To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Nick Desaulniers , Arnd Bergmann , Stefan Agner Cc: linux-kernel , Rasmus Villemoes , Eli Friedman , Christopher Li , Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , Masahiro Yamada , Joe Perches , Dominique Martinet , Linus Torvalds , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:56:04PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> > >> Since Linus/Andrew/you >> didn't comment on whether you wanted or not this for 4.19, we are >> assuming they would go in for 4.20. However, Stefan/Nick/... wanted >> this for 4.19 instead, they asked me to extract these patches two >> separately for 4.19. I let them comment further on the status of Clang >> on arm32. > > If these do not fix a regression, I don't see how they would be ready > for 4.19-final. Ok, I will wait a bit to send v5 until this is sorted out. [CC'd Nick, Stefan, Arnd: I just noticed the Reviewed-by/... lines were not picked as CC]. > >> I am going to send a v5 of the entire series without these two >> patches, based on -rc4 (or -next, which one do you prefer? I would say >> these patches should be applied early in the -next branches, so that >> everyone is ready for the change, given it "touches" every translation >> unit). > > That's up to whomever takes these into their tree for linux-next > inclusion. If you are about to break everything, then you might > consider changing your patches so they do not do that :) > Well, the series shouldn't break anything (famous last words :), even if everyone includes those headers. So, in theory, they *could* be applied anywhere, anytime; but given they are global changes... Cheers, Miguel